apache license wiki

Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPLFirst borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differencesThe following is a brief introduction to the above agreement:BSD Open Source AgreementThe BSD Open

This article was reproduced from: http://blog.csdn.net/testcs_dn/article/details/38496107Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPLFirst borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differencesThe follo

Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPL First borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differences The following is a brief introduction to the above agreement:BSD Open Source AgreementThe BSD O

a picture of open source License Agreement, open Source license GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differences Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPLFirst borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open so

Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPLFirst borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differencesThe following is a brief introduction to the above agreement:BSD Open Source AgreementThe BSD Open

source organization Apache. The agreement is similar to BSD, encouraging code sharing and respecting the authorship of the original author, as well as allowing the code to be modified and republished (as open source or commercial software). Conditions that need to be met:* Need to give code to users a copy of Apache License* If you modify the code, you need to m

understanding of where Web 2.0 is located throughout the web's development process. However, one of the most interesting aspects of WEB 2.0 applications is that it requires a considerable degree of collaboration between the developer and the participant to achieve good results. Collaboration is an important part of the development of Web 2.0, a view that is recognized by many modern enterprises. Blogs and wikis are WEB 2.0 technologies that allow users to collaborate on a particular topic or i

ArticleDirectory Extjs open source license Raise Questions Extaspnet since open source, has always adhered to the principle of open source free, but its GPL v2 protocol also makes some developers feel embarrassed, for example, someone mentioned this problem: http://www.cnblogs.com/sanshi/archive/2012/02/05/2339242.html To further clarify the principle that extaspnet is open-source and free (not only for individual developers, bu

, except the source of work in the derivative work.7 DisclaimerExcept as required by law or in writing, Liscensor provides this work,contributor to provide this contribution as is and is not responsible for any form of liability, and you yourself need to judge the risks associated with the use and release of the work.8 Scope of responsibilityIn any case, contributor does not need to be responsible for your loss, including direct, indirect, incidental. Even if someone reminds contributor there is

own projects. It can be distributed for free or used for profit. The only restriction is that the license statement must be included. The MIT protocol is the loose of all open-source licenses. It must include a license statement without any restrictions. ApacheCompared with other open-source protocols, Apache 2.0 provides users with a copyright

First borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differencesThe following is a brief introduction to the above agreement:BSD Open Source AgreementThe BSD Open source agreement is an agreement that gives users a great deal of freedom. Basically users can "do whatever", can use freely, mo

closed-source Android opponents. Because, as long as Android constantly out of the new version, the community constantly follow up, and constantly modify the API, other Android-based development companies have to put their patches back to the trunk, otherwise, Will inevitably cost a lot of manpower and resources in the maintenance of their patches (money this aspect you have to fight Google?) ), not worth the candle. Moreover, after the close of the source, and the whole community as an enemy,

, Will inevitably cost a lot of manpower and resources in the maintenance of their patches (money this aspect you have to fight Google?) ), not worth the candle. Moreover, after the close of the source, and the whole community as an enemy, as a positioning software platform project, will churn out a large number of application software developers, to small broad, any business company will not do this kind of low-odds stupid.See why Linux released with the GPL is more successful than the BSD rele