bitbucket code review

This article is the fifth part of the "loose Pair programming" series. (One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and eight, the ninth and later articles in this series can be found in the topic catalog .) The loose pair is different from the tight pair. Two people don't always sit together to locate the problem and solve the problem at any time, but sit together for a short time. There are two main tasks at the post-Checkpoint: one is to check whether the results meet the requirements (what to d

Introduction IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC) is a software development environment on the IBM rational next-generation collaboration platform for software delivery technology-jazz platform, which enables agile development through integrated work item tracking, source control, and configurable process management. Process management is an important feature that distinguishes it from the generic version management tool, and it focuses more on integrating the management of

Label: Style Color SP strong on problem code design programCode Lookup: Programmers and testers form a review team to run the program through logic.Step 1: The team members should read the design specifications, program texts, and other relevant documents in advance.Step 2: Use test cases to run program logic, record traces of programs, and discover, discuss, and solve problemsCode

[Discussion] Code Review: is it a good idea or a bad idea? (Original article address) posted on | 4565 views | source csdn | 16 comments | Author Xia mengzhu programmer review code Abstract:The advantage of code review is that it

Statement: This article after I translated the first published in Bole Online, no matter what form of reprint please indicate the same place.Millions of years ago, the ape came down from the tree and evolved the right thumb, finally. Become human.We look at the mandatory code review in a similar light: it seems to be something that separates humans from the beast in a vast field of software development (

1. Whether code specification is requiredConsider the following arguments and refute/support for whether you need to have code specifications:These norms are the result of the bureaucratic system of wasting everyone's programming time, affecting people's development efficiency, waste of time things.Wrong. Code specification is designed to facilitate the communica

This article translated from: Dzone.com/articles/4-types-of-code-reviews-any-professional-developer Please specify the Source: Grape City website, Grape City for developers to provide professional development tools, solutions and services, empowering developers. No one can guarantee that the code he produces must be perfect. The following is a description of the 4 main types of

1. Keywords, syntax, operating mechanism, code logic2. Code functions. The code is concise. Not lengthy. Code to reuse, abstract out, do not copy/paste3. New, code review, code quality

author Shaojian posted on December 8, 2010 4:51 A.M. Eric Landes recently described code reviews as a tool to help teams improve their software maturity, and ultimately to deliver higher value to customers, in an article called Agile skills: when and how to conduct code reviews. He introduces code reviews from the following sections Agile Engineering Practice Er

1. Whether code specification is required (5 points)for the need for code specification, consider the following arguments and refute / Support: These norms are the result of bureaucratic waste of programming time, affecting people's development efficiency , something that wastes time. I am an artist, a craftsman, I have my own norms and principles. Norms can not be forced to all, should a

"Editor's note" for Hugo Giraudel, the author discusses the importance of code review and how to implement it from various angles. The article is a domestic ITOM management platform OneAPM compiled rendering. The following is the text.Recently, I saw this remark on Twitter:Sadly, for many students, freelancers, and institutions, code censorship seems rather unfam

review:This is the code review Form I gave to the peer group. General Does The code work? Does It perform it intended function, the logic is correct etc. The program can run normally, and the functions are all complete. Is all the code easily understood? The