count rows in table

-- If 0 is specified, the current database is used. The statistics are updated before use. DBCC updateusage (0) -- Or DBCC updateusage ('db ') -- DBCC updateusage correct the rows, used, reserved, and dpages columns of the sysindexes table and the

Use BINARY_CHECKSUM to detect changes in the table's rows without USEAdventureWorks2012; GOCREATETABLEmyTable (column1int, column2varchar (256); values (1, test); values (*) frommyTable; GOUPDATEmyTablesetcolumn2 Using BINARY_CHECKSUM to detect

Translator: ye Jinrong (imysql # imysql.com), source: imysql.com, please reprint it. Cause: It is too slow to make count (*) Statistics on the innodb table, so try to see if you can hurry up. Symptom: Let's take a look at several test cases. 1. Test

The table structure is as follows:Mysql> Show CREATE TABLE user\g;*************************** 1. Row *************************** table:usercreate table:create Table ' user ' ( ' id ' int (ten) unsigned not NULL AUTO _increment, ' name '

The table structure is as follows: The code is as follows Copy Code Mysql> Show CREATE TABLE Userg;1. Row ***************************Table:userCreate table:create Table ' user ' (' ID ' int (a) unsigned not NULL

SQL tuning is primarily about reducing the number of consistent gets and physical reads. COUNT (1) is compared with COUNT (*): If your datasheet does not have a primary key, then count (1) is faster than COUNT (*)If you have a primary key, the

The number of records in the database table is: Sql> Select COUNT (*) from table_name t; COUNT (*)----------6873 1, using the statistical results of COUNT (*): Sql> alter session Set Nls_language = "American"; Session altered. Sql> set timing on;Sql>

Count1) with Count (*) Comparison: If your data table does not have a primary key, COUNT (1) than COUNT (*Fast If there is a primary key, then the primary key (the Federated primary key) as the count condition is also more than count (*) to be quick

SQL Optimization-count, table join sequence, conditional order, in, exist, countexist 1. About count I have read some articles about count (*) and count (Column). Is the efficiency of count (column) higher than that of count? In fact, I personally

In ABAP, if we want to use code to get the number of records in a database table, the general practice is to use select COUNT.If you are using the Hana database, there is now a new way to achieve the same goal. The Hana database has a system view