cs50 review

[Execution instructions] 1. What is an effective review? I often think about this problem. [Body ]--- Software Department review system Change history Serial number Modify terms Modify content Modified by/date Secondary note

A few days ago saw "code Review Programmer's Hope and sadness", think of our team to carry out Code Review also has 2 years, the results are relatively satisfied, some experience should be able to share with you, explore.Why should we implement code review? We were faced with code clutter and bug-frequency situations.At the time I felt that there was a need to ch

As we all know, the postgraduate entrance exam is a systematic and massive project that needs to be fully grasped. In this year or half a year, how do I organize my own review plan? How can I effectively manage my review time? How can we greatly improve learning efficiency through scientific review planning and time management? These are undoubtedly the most impo

Address: http://www.phabricator.com/docs/phabricator/article/Audit_User_Guide.html OverviewPhabricator supports two code review workflows: Review (pre-submission review) and Audit (post-Submission review ).This document outlines the post-Submission review process using the a

First login, clickSummary, description, Testingdone, branch, Group, people , Review upload diff file, select project, New Request Publish Released: Review Board Support Pre-commit Review and Post-commit Review two modes, in short, is the first Review to submit or first commi

Design reviews are an important part of the design process. It is a part of the design process that cannot be overlooked, whether in an independent design team, or in a mobile or remote design group. Through the team design review, in different members of the review, comments to get feedback, so that you stand outside the perspective of the previous design works, so you can better make design decisions, ove

This tweet is a former colleague to share the time of the PPT, here I sorted out to share to everyone What is code review?Code review is a quality assurance mechanism that verifies code implementation by systematically checking the source code during the software development process.Why not do code review? Business needs are big and working hours ar

I recently read an article about code review on infoq, which is a translation edited by infoq. I later read the original article, and I feel that the translator has missed some background knowledge and more details of the original article. So I re-translated it again. Please criticize and correct the translation. Original article and infoq link: Infoq: http://www.infoq.com/cn/news/2010/12/agile-code-review

Specially planned on 51cto Security ChannelThe path to growth of cisspIn the previous articles in the series, j0ker briefly introduced the basic information about the cissp Certification Examination, however, for those who want to learn more about the cissp certification system or want to get a cissp certification, the content is a little simpler. Therefore, from the beginning of this article, j0ker will spend about 15 articles to introduce the review

First, background: This week's software testing in the classroom, we in the case of self-grouping, Yao classmate's car parking location management system has peer Review, Chinese is peer test. This is the first time I've been in touch with peer testing, so let me introduce peer review.Second, peer review definition: is a way to identify defects through the author's peers and need to change the area of the i

Remember the last time review Board This online code review tool was a year ago, when the review Board version was 1.0.3; A colleague from the department is also tossing review Board, but now the version has been upgraded to 1.5.1. The new version of review board apparently

First, learning Ladder division:First-order Basis comprehensive review (March ~ June)Second-order reinforcement familiarity (July ~ October)Third-order mode to examine the lack of traps (November ~ December 15th)Four-stage finishing touch-up status (December 16 ~ Pre-exam)Ii. Bibliography:Essential Resources:Math Exam Syllabus"Advanced Mathematics" Tongji version: To explain the more detailed, difficult questions moderate, involving a wide range of co

As mentioned in the previous article, I no longer work in Google. I have not figured out where to go-there are two or three very good job opportunities in front of me. Because during this decision period, I was no longer employed by anyone. I wanted to write something professional, something interesting, however, it also causes tension between colleagues and management work. Google is a very good company. They have made a lot of commendable things-both outside the company, what people can see,

Literature Review is an academic paper written after comprehensive analysis of a large amount of information collected from a topic. It is a scientific document. Literature reviews reflect the latest progress, academic opinions, and suggestions of a certain branch or important topic in a certain field. They often reflect the new trends, new trends, new levels, new principles, and new technologies of relevant issues. and so on. Students are required to

In the development process, many teams use code reviews or code Review to ensure code quality. Generally, code Review uses a collective Review. Collective Review Form: A team is sitting in a meeting room. One person explains his own business and code implementation, and other members of the team

Guidance:CodeReview has been widely recognized as a very good practice. Many large companies such as Google are also doing code review. Code review not only helps your work, but also shares knowledge. The original Article is code reviews in the 21st century. This article is now compiled.ArticleThe content is as follows: Code review can end in the software engin