cs50 review

Materials Graduate students from the Computer Science Institute in 2010 Review admission requirements and arrangements In accordance with the spirit of the Ministry of Education and relevant school documents, the School of Computer Science now has the following arrangements for re-admission of master's students in 2010. I. General principles 1.Adhere to the principles of fairness, justice and openness. 2.Enrollment type: 1)Master of Engineering in

I remember when I first started my project at the company, mentor wanted to check some of the code I just implemented with me. At that time, I was puzzled. Didn't I trust the code I wrote? It turns out that my code has many defects, some of which are still very serious. Later, I learned that this process is called code review. It is a means to ensure the quality of software and an important means. There are multiple types of code

Tags: was PNG boot first step self mail ati file willRemove Amazon review bad reviews, I think the three strokes to be more reliable!Amazon attaches particular importance to review, which directly affects listing's views and sales, and can even destroy an account. What do you do when you meet a bad review? There are many ways to remove Amazon

Peer review is a peer review process, where an author's academic work or plan is reviewed by other experts and scholars in the same field. In the publishing unit mainly peer-reviewed method to select and screening of the delivered manuscript acceptance or not, and the funds provided by the unit, but also in a peer-reviewed manner to determine whether the grant of research fellowships.1 ConceptsThe peer-revi

In the article "the soft side of peer reviews" (soft surface of peer review), Karl wiegers will begin with this high-profile statement: Note: Karl E. wiegers is a world-renowned software engineering master and is known for its research and practice in the fields of demand, project management, and process improvement. He was a Special Editor and columnist of the IEEE software magazine Editorial Board and the authoritative journal softwaredevelopment. H

GRE material reserves:★The silly word heibao book: the most important book in the entire g test process has been officially published. ★Chen Shengyuan's gre sentence filling: the best guide book provided by New Oriental; ★Yang Ji's gre reading analysis and full interpretation: The best reading book for beginners; ★Yang Peng's "GRE GMAT difficult sentence reading tutorial": Helps adapt to the sentences in GRE reading; ★Qian Yongqiang's "GRE logical analysis": This book is no longer very suitable

From: Zhuang zhoumengbutterfly1. First, the attitude should be correct.CodeSelf-review does not deny yourself, but gives yourself a better chance to do your job. During the review process, you should try to review your code as a bystander, despite the difficulty. 2. Code review is inseparable from refactoring. During

First, preface 1, the main content of this article GitLab Code Review Mechanism description Git Workflow and git Code Review Workflow GitLab Code Review Configuration Instructions GitLab Code Review Process Demo GitLab for IDE plugin introduction (JetBrains, etc.) 2. GitLab Code

The order Bo Master simple number of their own published asynchronous article, has been intermittent 8, this time I would like to take the return type of async as an example, to talk alone. An async method has three possible return types:task 1. C # Basics Review the return type of async Summary: When to use which return type, specific analysis is required. If it's not used properly, the results of the program may not be what you want, so let's talk

I. Literature Review The literature review is a style different from the research paper that graduate students have read a topic of literature in advance, which is understood, organized, integrated, and analyzed and evaluated. The purpose of the review is to reflect the new level, new trends, new technologies and new discoveries of a subject. From its history to

Code review is one of the most important ways to eliminate bugs, and these reviews are particularly effective most of the time. Because the code review itself is aimed at the object, is to overlook the entire code in the testing process of problems and bugs. Also, code reviews can help eliminate some of the special details of errors, especially those that are easily found when reading code, which are often

1. Jupiter is an open source Eclipse code review plugin that stores review data in XML form. 2. Review data needs to be passed in the version control System (CVS/SVN). 3, three stages: individual review stage (individual Phase), team review stage (group Phase), issue rep

After a project is completed, you must be able to obtain the benefits of executing the project. The implementation of the project is always purposeful, and the owner should also ensure that the funds they invest in all the project work are worthwhile. To achieve this, a formal approach is to hold a project closing review. The project termination review or post-implementation

Software requirements are the most important input of software development, demand risk is often the biggest risk in software development process, one of the most important means to reduce demand risk is demand review, but demand review is the most difficult one in all assessment activities and one of the most easily overlooked. The author has experienced the following several failed needs

A peer-reviewed walkthrough was conducted in this week's test class, and we had a very enthusiastic discussion, but I also found some less understood processes, such as how to plan activities, what is the purpose of the daytime, the technical review, the formal inspection, and when. I did a bit of detailed research.First of all, Peer Review (peer review) as part

No one denies the function of code review (Code review and review) to improve code quality. But how does one review code? There are some methods and techniques. Improper methods will waste a lot of time and cause inefficiency. Too tight processes will greatly reduce productivity and process loose. It is difficult to kn

developers tempted users to perform fraudulent IAP. In fact, there is indeed a malicious in-app payment phenomenon. Currently, the in-APP purchase specification is a good third-party specification for users and developers, and apple. Although Apple's policy is tough and sometimes unfriendly, its strict review standards are indeed justified in the Dropbox incident. But why does most media think this is an audit error, or even Apple's intention? There

A tiered review can help you control the Internet content you see on that computer. This function is very useful, if you have children in your home, this function can help you to prevent him from surfing the internet when you are not at home, such as violence and sex. In fact, people who have used IE may know the classification of the password, if you have not noticed, please run IE, click the "tools" → "Internet Options" menu, in the pop-up dialog bo

Recently, the project has been exposed to Apple's in-APP purchase (IAP), and many problems have been encountered. It can be solved only by referring to many posts. Here, I would like to sum up how much it can help for the first time to contact IAP Children's shoes. It is less costly to face Apple's strict review. I don't need to talk much about it. I know how to get involved .. I will not talk about how to create an IAP here. It should be noted that m

We call code review a cr, that is, code review. It is an important quality assurance activity from project progress to coding stage. However, many times, our Cr work is in the form, and we cannot find essential problems in the CR process, mainly due to the following four reasons: First, the purpose of Cr is not strong, and there is a lack of pertinence. The fundamental purpose of Cr is to ensure quality, bu