Discover how to avoid deadlock in sql server, include the articles, news, trends, analysis and practical advice about how to avoid deadlock in sql server on alibabacloud.com
This article will introduce several major steps for SQL Server Profiler to analyze deadlocks. This is also to help you better manage your databases.
In two or more SQL Server processes, a deadlock occurs when each process locks the resources that other processes attempt to l
Label:First, a scalar-valued function, Diglock, is used to recursively detect if there is a lock loop for each session in SQL Server, and if the function eventually returns 1, the lock loop is detected (that is, a deadlock is detected), and if the final return of 0 indicates that no lock loop is detected. 1 CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[Diglock]
2 (
3 @spid int,
4
#tmp_lock_who
return 0
We only need to execute Sp_who_lock in the Query Analyzer, we can specifically capture the execution of the blocking process, then we can the corresponding SQL statements or stored procedures for performance improvement and design.
So we are in the database design, although not completely avoid deadlock, but can make the number of deadl
, making the most "inexpensive" transaction rollback (based on the number of bytes that the transaction needs to write to the transaction log). You can easily resolve this deadlock in 2 tables by providing an index to the Column2. In that case, SQL Server can perform the lookup (seek) operator of a conforming column, so when you execute a SELECT statement, you ca
blocked processes, in this case, we can improve and design the performance of corresponding SQL statements or stored procedures.
Therefore, although we cannot completely avoid deadlocks during database design, we can minimize the number of deadlocks. Increase transaction throughput and reduce system overhead. because there are only a few transactions, you must follow the following principles:
Access object
Tags: clean tag exclusive lock nbsp Date started SPI net designationOriginal: SQL Server deadlock troubleshootingRemember the previous customer in the use of software, there are occasional deadlock problems, because the time is uncertain, not good to reproduce the problem, at that time to solve the problem is a bit tri
In fact, the deepest reason for all deadlocks is: resource competitionSQL server deadlock 1:A user A accesses table A (locking table A) and then accesses Table BAnother user B accesses Table B (Table B is locked) and then attempts to access TableAt this time, user A has locked Table B because user B has to wait for User B to release Table B to continue. Well, the old man will have to wait honestly.Similarly
Tags: Extended event xevent extented EventsSQL ServerHow to monitor the deadlock (Deadlock)What is a deadlock? The so-called deadlock : refers to two or more than two processes in the course of execution, because of competing resources or due to the communication between each other caused by a blocking phenomenon, if t
Tags: exe SQL buffer value monitoring database called related permissions heightBackground we monitor the database blocking situation in the database blocking timely email alert alert, in order to better maintain the database, especially to enhance the end customer user experience, we should try to avoid the deadlock in the database situation. We know that collec
"SQL Server 2005 Deadlock resolution Discovery" mentioned a while ago, serious deadlock, the average occurrence of a deadlock every day, in the resolution and processing of SQL server2005 dead
Querying a stored procedure for SQL Server database deadlockThe use of SQL Server as a database application system will not be able to avoid the occasional deadlock. After the deadlock
From: http://www.oecp.cn/hi/zhaolihong/blog/1980
When SQL Server was recently used in projects, it was found that frequent updates and frequent queries cause deadlocks in high concurrency. We usually know that if two transactions insert or modify data to a table at the same time, it will occur when the X lock of the table is requested, and it is already held by the other party. Because the lock is not obta
=1
Begin
DECLARE @spid varchar (10), @ Logo varchar (10)
While @iBegin
Select @spid = Process id,@ flag = flag from #t where id=@i
Insert #t1 EXEC (' DBCC INPUTBUFFER (' + @spid + ') ')
If @ @rowcount =0 insert #t1 (a) VALUES (NULL)
IF @ flag = ' deadlock process ' exec (' kill ' + @spid)
Set @i=@i+1
End
End
Else
While @iBegin
Select @s= ' DBCC INPUTBUFFER (' +cast (process ID as varchar) + ') ' from #t where id=@i
Insert #t1 EXEC (@s)
on the first connection. The application then starts other transactions, issue queries on another connection, and wait for the results. When SQL Server Returns a connection result, the application starts to process the result. The application processes the results in this way until the query of the generated results is blocked by the query executed on another connection, resulting in no available results.
This article sample source code or material download
Deadlocks are hard to avoid for today's RDBMS architectures-and are most prevalent in high-volume OLTP environments. It is because of the presence of the. NET Common Language Runtime (CLR) that SQL Server 2005 can provide developers with a new method of error handling. In this month's column, Ron Talmage descr
, but the lock cannot be obtained because transaction 2 locks it up. A transaction cannot release a held lock until it is committed or rolled back. They cannot be committed or rolled back because the transaction requires a lock controlled by the other to continue.
Deadlocks are often confused with normal blocking. The second transaction waits for the lock to be freed when one transaction locks the resource required by another transaction. By default, SQL
Find the source of SQL Server deadlock and blocking-find the source of SQL Server deadlock and blocking
Copy codeThe Code is as follows:Use masterGoDeclare @ spid int, @ bl intDECLARE s_cur CURSORSelect 0, blockedFrom (select * fr
impression. So modify this problem got the boss's support, to tell the truth, I also encountered this problem for the first time, also can't think of how the SELECT statement is dead locked. I know this problem is very headache, fortunately, with the support of the boss, will give enough time for me to solve the problem, I also have confidence.On the internet to find a lot of articles, my solution is: through the query to find the deadlock-related
with a U lock for future conversion to an X lock. And in the update, then completely become an X lock, the scope of the lock mode is also a range x-x. Because the updated data columns are different (possibly indexed, possibly not), the indexes used are different (clustered, nonclustered, unique, etc.), so the situation is not as easy to draw as the Range s-s lock. In general, there are several things that are consistent, and this is no longer an experiment (this is a highly recommended reading
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.