java finally return value

Today's visit to the forum found a very interesting question: Who can give me an explanation of the result of this procedure is: 2. Instead of: 3 The code is as follows:Class Test {public int aaa () { int x = 1; try {

There are a lot of people on the Internet to discuss the exception capture mechanism in Java try...catch...finally The finally statement in the block is bound to be executed? A lot of people say no, of course their answer is right, after I have

There are a lot of people on the Internet to discuss the exception capture mechanism in Java try...catch...finally The finally statement in the block is bound to be executed? A lot of people say no, of course their answer is right, after I have

There are a lot of people on the Internet to discuss the exception capture mechanism in Java try...catch...finally The finally statement in the block is bound to be executed? A lot of people say no, of course their answer is right, after I have

Reprint: http://blog.csdn.net/sureyonder/article/details/5560538The Java Virtual machine "calls" the subroutine of the finally clause at the end of each try statement block and its associated catch clause. In fact, the finally clause behaves very

Can not underestimate this simple finally, seemingly simple problems behind, but hidden countless mystery. Next I will take you step-by-step to uncover this finally mysterious veil.Problem Analysisfirst of all, let me ask you a question: Finally

Today's visit to the forum found a very interesting question: Who can give me an explanation of the result of this procedure is: 2. Instead of: 3 The code is as follows:class Test {public int aaa() {int x = 1;try {return ++x;} catch

There is a return statement in the try and finally block where no exception is thrown in the 1:try block[Java]View PlainCopy Public static int noexception () { int i=10; try{ System.out.println ("I in Try block is" +i); return-I.; }

Today's visit to the forum found a very interesting question: Who can give me an explanation of the result of this procedure is: 2. Instead of: 3 The code is as follows:class Test {public int aaa() {int x = 1;try {return ++x;} catch

Today's visit to the forum found a very interesting question: Who can give me an explanation of the result of this procedure is: 2. Instead of: 3 The code is as follows:class Test {public int aaa() {int x = 1;try {return ++x;} catch