lgpl vs gpl

Recently, I checked GPL and LGPL on the Internet and made some notes. Before that, the author of Building Embeded Linux System was quoted as follows: The following is a legal disclaimer. We are not lawyers. If you have any questions about your plan, consult a lawyer. In addition to GPL and LGPL, there are BSD an

Qt GPL, LGPL Commercial License From:Http://www.qteverywhere.com/Qt 4.5 provides three authorization protocols: GPL, LGPL, and cial. Many may ask why three authorization protocols are required for the same product, under what circumstances is the most appropriate authorization protocol? Here I will give a gen

a picture of open source License Agreement, open Source license GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differences Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPLFirst borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License

There are many open source agreements that exist today, and there are currently 58 types of open source agreements approved by the Initiative Organization (Http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical). Our common open source agreements such as BSD, GPL, lgpl,mit, etc. are all OSI-approved protocols. If you want to open up your own code, it's best to choose these approved open source protocols. Here we

Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPLFirst borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differencesThe following is a brief introduction to the above agreement:BSD Open Source AgreementThe BSD Open

When Adobe, Microsoft, sun and other giants began to show their favor for "Open Source", the era of "open source" is approaching! Originally from: sinoprise.com/read.php? Tid-662-page-e-fpage-1.html (unfortunately this link has not been opened), I basically did not change, just some typographical and finishing.References: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ There are many open-source protocols today, and there are currently 58 open-source protocols approved by the Open Source Initiative O

This article is referenced in the literature: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/There are many open source agreements that exist today, and there are currently 58 types of open Source initiative that have been approved by the organization. Our common open source agreements such as BSD, GPL, lgpl,mit, etc. are all OSI-approved protocols. If you want to open up your own code, it's best to choose these app

Http://www.cnblogs.com/top5/archive/2010/07/31/1789657.htmlThis article is referenced in the literature: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/There are many open source agreements that exist today, and there are currently 58 types of open Source initiative that have been approved by the organization. Our common open source agreements such as BSD, GPL, lgpl,mit, etc. are all OSI-approved protocols. If you w

First borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differencesThe following is a brief introduction to the above agreement:BSD Open Source AgreementThe BSD Open source agreement is an agreement that gives users a great deal of freedom. Basically users can "do whatever", can use freely, mo

When Adobe, Microsoft, Sun and a series of giants began to show the "open source" of favor, "open source" era is coming!Originally from: sinoprise.com/read.php?tid-662-page-e-fpage-1.html (unfortunately this link has not been opened), I basically did not change, just some typesetting and collation.Reference: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/There are many open source agreements that exist today, and there are currently 58 (http://www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) Open Source Initiat

Link: http://www.awflasher.com/blog/archives/939 When Adobe, Microsoft, sun and other giants began to show their favor for "Open Source", the era of "open source" is approaching! Originally from: sinoprise.com/read.php? Tid-662-page-e-fpage-1.html (unfortunately this link has not been opened), I basically did not change, just some typographical and finishing.References: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ There are many open-source protocols today, and there are currently 58 open-source prot

, both open source and free, as long as it is used in a software ("Use" refers to a class library reference, modified code or derivative code) of the GPL-based product. This is known as "contagious". GPL products are used as a standalone product without any problems and can also enjoy the benefits of free.Since the GPL is strictly required for software products t

Internet, the source code also has a lot of FTP way to get.Copyleft is only effective when the program is re-released. Modifications to the software may not be made public or open to source code, as long as it is not released. Note that copyleft only has effect on the software, and the output of the software is not effective (unless the software itself is output). However, this may be changed in GPL version 3.LgplThe GNU wide Universal Public License

Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPLFirst borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differencesThe following is a brief introduction to the above agreement:BSD Open Source AgreementThe BSD Open

compatible than GPL. GPL-compatible, which is a library that can be used in GPL software, which must be weaker than the GPL (e.g. LGPL,BSD) and not a commercial license. Here is a list of compatible lists of the FSF approved software licenses. Because of this, the

This article was reproduced from: http://blog.csdn.net/testcs_dn/article/details/38496107Open source licenses The difference between GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache, and LGPLFirst borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL differencesThe follo

From http://www.awflasher.com/blog/archives/939 When Adobe, Microsoft, sun and other giants began to show their favor for "Open Source", the era of "open source" is approaching! Originally from: sinoprise.com/read.php? Tid-662-page-e-fpage-1.html (unfortunately this link has not been opened), I basically did not change, just some typographical and finishing.References: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ There are many open-source protocols today, and there are currently 58 open-sour

When Adobe, Microsoft, sun and other giants began to show their favor for "Open Source", the era of "open source" is approaching! From: http://www.sinoprise.com/read.php? Tid-662-page-e-fpage-1.html (regret is that this link has not opened), I basically did not change, just some typographical and finishing.References: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/ There are many open source protocols today, and there are currently 58 open source protocols approved by the Open Source Initiative Organiza

The Coocox team has also gradually increased the emphasis on software and code protocols due to the Coocox number of users and the growing influence. In the process of collection and collation, some of the good information to share with you.First borrow a fairly straightforward diagram of the people who are interested to divide the various protocols: Open source License GPL, BSD, MIT, Mozilla, Apache and LGPL