open pdc file without license

source organization Apache. The agreement is similar to BSD, encouraging code sharing and respecting the authorship of the original author, as well as allowing the code to be modified and republished (as open source or commercial software). Conditions that need to be met:* Need to give code to users a copy of Apache License* If you modify the code, you need to modify the

! Network security software license (expired on February 6)Avast! Network security software license)Avast! Network security software license (expired on February 11)1. Download and install avast! After the installation is complete, such:2. Click "set" in the middle to enter the following interface:3. Click "contract" to enter ():()4. In (), click Insert

agreement: If you accuse someone else of infringing a patent on the product under this license agreement, your authorization will be automatically terminated, however, this only applies to works with patent rights. As long as you do not file a lawsuit against a patent, you will never have to worry about this problem .) There is also a special requirement for redistribution of works. In general, it is nece

. Rights cannot be changed.Once a right is granted, it cannot be deprived. That is to say, you don't have to worry about this situation when using this software: when you develop an enviable derivative product based on this software, someone suddenly jumped out and said, sorry, you will no longer be allowed to use this program. (There is a clause in this agreement: If you accuse someone else of infringing a patent on the product under this license ag

with the source code, binary plate with the GPL license, so that posterity can be very clear about this software licensing information. The essence of the GPL is that, as long as the software in the case of full open source, as far as possible to allow users to free play space, so that the software to achieve faster and better development. Regardless of the form in which the software is publ

software license. section 3.3 provides indirect compatibility between this license and the gnu gpl version 2.0, the GNU lgpl version 2.1, the GNU agpl version 3.0, and all later versions of those licenses. Which one should I choose? There are some Chinese documents on the comparison of these protocols: Document 1 and document 2. Among these protocols, I am familiar with Apache

and in code derived from the source code) need to have the original code of the Agreement, trademarks, patent statements and other original author rules need to include the instructions.If the rereleased product contains a notice file, the Apache Licence is required in the notice file. You can add your own permission to the notice, but you may not be able to make changes to Apache licence.Apache licence is

, everyone is used to piracy and cracking, and it is taken for granted that such free software is encapsulated into their own commercial components for sale. If you are doing this, immediately stop and study the license agreement for these open source components, or one day you will receive a subpoena from the court. If you are developing or preparing to develop open