pfsense review

The Sprint Review Conference has long been an important part of scrum, a mechanism for the team to get feedback on the product increments that are delivered by the iteration. At the Sprint review meeting, the product owner determines the priority of the next sprint's requirements based on the feedback received.So, is the sprint review now obsolete?Ten years ago,

Why code Review is requiredRecently read some articles, found that some of the ideas of agile development more and more teams in practice, also feel that agile is no longer as early as the time so virtual, there are many tools to embody this concept emerges. Among them, "How to improve the quality of code" has been a lot of discussion, agile development also has a good variety of proposals, the most well-known, but also the most unreliable should be p

This article organizes the basic process of submitting code to the OpenStack community, as well as some information about the community. If there is reprint, please indicate the source!Let's take a picture to illustrate the general flow of OpenStack code review:The process for submitting code changes to OpenStack is mainly as follows: Configuring Git and Gerrit Environments Clone the code of the target project and make changes on the new branch Commit to a local repo and push it

A peer-reviewed walkthrough was conducted in this week's test class, and we had a very enthusiastic discussion, but I also found some less understood processes, such as how to plan activities, what is the purpose of the daytime, the technical review, the formal inspection, and when. I did a bit of detailed research.First of all, Peer Review (peer review) as part

No one denies the function of code review (Code review and review) to improve code quality. But how does one review code? There are some methods and techniques. Improper methods will waste a lot of time and cause inefficiency. Too tight processes will greatly reduce productivity and process loose. It is difficult to kn

Use LaravelModeration extension to implement a simple content review system in Laravel applications 1. Introduction Laravel Moderation is based on Laravel 5. * The implemented simple content review system allows or rejects requests to application resources, such as articles, comments, and users, in order to keep the app Pure by blocking content that is offensive, offensive, or insulting. Simply put, it is

Chen nengtech 2007-9-20 Original article:"44" metrics for test case review without tiveness-http://davidfrico.com/roi-metrics-f.htm 1. Major defects per test case reviewMajor defects found in each reviewed test case2. minor defects per test case reviewSecondary defects discovered in each reviewed test case 3. Total defects per test case reviewTotal number of defects discovered in each reviewed test case 4. Ratio of major to minor defects per test cas

Recently, the project has been exposed to Apple's in-APP purchase (IAP), and many problems have been encountered. It can be solved only by referring to many posts. Here, I would like to sum up how much it can help for the first time to contact IAP Children's shoes. It is less costly to face Apple's strict review. I don't need to talk much about it. I know how to get involved .. I will not talk about how to create an IAP here. It should be noted that m

We call code review a cr, that is, code review. It is an important quality assurance activity from project progress to coding stage. However, many times, our Cr work is in the form, and we cannot find essential problems in the CR process, mainly due to the following four reasons: First, the purpose of Cr is not strong, and there is a lack of pertinence. The fundamental purpose of Cr is to ensure quality, bu

Interaction prototype is an important output in the process of product development, which not only determines the product's presentation layer form, but also can better validate the demand and clear the product target in the case of visual display of product function. The establishment of an interactive prototyping program usually comes from a joint review by cross-functional personnel. How to effectively conduct interactive

Code review ensures that Code Quality is an important part. Its main work is: 1. Discover bugs in the Code; 2. Check the code quality from the perspective of code maintainability and scalability, and propose suggestions for modification. 1. bugs in the Code mainly appear in the following two places:(1) bugs unrelated to business logic.For example, the stream, file, and connection opened in the system are not closed in time, thread safe problems e

stress into power (Don ' t worry about worrying); 4) The Essence of scientific research is to explore the unknown and not to expect your mentor to teach you anything, so read more literature, communicate with different people, learn to utilize resources (use your); 5) Focus on unusual things (pay attention to The unusual), perhaps one of the results of your experiment that seems to be wrong, happens to be an important discovery. She also gives advice on how to deal with mentors and other collea

650) this.width=650; "src=" Http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M02/57/58/wKiom1SYKXLSi9vuAAE2hoxGyng229.jpg "title=" Picture 1.jpg "alt=" Wkiom1sykxlsi9vuaae2hoxgyng229.jpg "/>Mockplus is a quick and easy prototyping tool (Https://www.mockplus.cn/referralr=r35uu7) that recently launched the Review feature. Review, designed to address the issues of communication and collaboration in the prototype design of a team pr

author Shaojian posted on December 8, 2010 4:51 A.M. Eric Landes recently described code reviews as a tool to help teams improve their software maturity, and ultimately to deliver higher value to customers, in an article called Agile skills: when and how to conduct code reviews. He introduces code reviews from the following sections Agile Engineering Practice Eric first suggests starting with the engineering practices that are usually needed by Agile teams: test-driven development, continuous i

For a good purpose, before submitting the code, you must automatically notify the relevant personnel to review the code. After the review code owner approves the code, the code can be submitted to the code repository, otherwise, review the changes again. Project engineers may not work in one place, such as ESRI, where engineers are distributed across different de

Peer review (peer review)Peer review (peer review, also known in some academic fields)) is a review process in which an author's academic work or plan is reviewed by other experts and scholars in the same field. In the publishing unit mainly peer-reviewed method to select an

Tag:getnaviginpuica not .sorgba program app rejected First, the introduction of expedited audit1, the general 50% of the application will be within 24h of the audit, more than 90% of the application within the radius of H have beenaudited. It also means that, from submission to review, there may be a whole day, and if it's a weekend (US time weekend), the time may be longer. However, if you have special circumstances, such as: The app has a serious

Introduced: In agile software development, the speed of code generation is much higher than that of traditional waterfall. Because we have made the time more compact. How can so much code guarantee the quality of the code? Many people may think directly of static code detection tools. Yes, those are the ones that can define a code-checking rule to ensure the quality of the code, but is that just from the language point of view, is the logic optimized? Has reusability been optimized to the extre

If you already have internal expertise, WAF seems a simple choice to meet your compliance requirements. But for IT security, there will never be such a simple method. For example, Web Application Firewall cannot prevent damages caused by logical defects of applications. Today's Web 2.0 applications use a lot of dynamic code. Considering the complexity of these Web 2.0 applications, logical defects can easily happen.In the face of this situation, the benefits of code

Data API and background data synchronization have been completed. I did not care about this part in about two days. Code Mainly because the products and bosses are not very active. Because this is not very important after all. Today, I reviewed the code and made some repairs, such as naming conventions and code logic, and made the code more compliant with the specifications of the entire framework (such as file classification, specifies the file to do what it should do ). So I had the urge to w