sdn controller comparison

A key challenge for software to define network potential users is to judge the specific value of a particular SDN controller, which, after all, plays a key role as a bridge between network applications and network infrastructures. However, there is no model to standardize SDN, and there is no standard that a SDN

The control layer is the SDN brain. It is responsible for centralized and unified control of underlying forwarding devices and provides interfaces for calling network capabilities for upstream services. It plays an important role in the SDN architecture, SDN controller is also the focus of

The Controller is responsible for centralized control of the entire SDN network and plays an important role in grasping the resource view of the entire network and improving network resource delivery. However, the centralization of control capabilities also means that the security and performance of the controller board become the bottleneck of the whole network.

SDN is the most popular technology concept nowadays. As the core component of the future network architecture, SDN controller is still evolving in the future. For enterprises, what functions and attributes do SDN controllers need to know in advance? The following are 10 functional standards that enterprises need to con

The previous article focused on theSDN Controller Test topic four : Floodlight South Interface test Report ( bottom ), The function test results of the controller are given. This article will test the floodlight controller According to the determined performance test item, and give the test result. 1 purpose of testingVerify The following performance scenarios f

The previous article focused on the SDN Controller Test topic four : Floodlight test Report for South-to-North interface ( bottom ) , the function test results of the controller are given. This article will test the floodlight controller According to the determined performance test item, and give the test result. 1 Pu

Recently has been learning Ryu controller, in the process of use, found the following aspects of the advantages: Ryu controller is written in Python language, in the understanding and speed is very fast; The Ryu controller's overall architecture is clear, In the future, I will organize an architectural article about the Ryu controller for your reference; The Ryu

configurations are concentrated on the wireless controller. This also makes the Fit AP solution more convenient for centralized management, and thus has three-tier roaming, user-based permission distribution and other features not available for Fat AP. Ii. comparison: The "wireless switch + thin Wireless Access Point" solution is a new architecture technology of the wireless LAN Solution in recent years, t

difference, that is, in a quadrant there are two formulas, there is a total of 8 different situations.The other one is speed:V=f/sinα+cosα, this is easy to deduce, that is to say, F is the speed of interpolation, that is, the speed of moving a pulse equivalent.Obviously, this speed range of 0.707 to 1, the interpolation speed and the actual tool movement speed is not very large, so there is no need for speed adjustment!!It was simple and rude indeed.By the way, the concept of pulse equivalence