1. The difference between count (1), COUNT (*), and count (column name)Believe that you are always at work, or in the study of Count () in the end how to use faster. There has been a lot of doubt, some people say that count (*) faster, some people
Count1) with Count (*) Comparison: If your data table does not have a primary key, COUNT (1) than COUNT (*Fast If there is a primary key, then the primary key (the Federated primary key) as the count condition is also more than count (*) to be quick
1) count (1) compared to COUNT (*):1. If your data table does not have a primary key, then count (1) is faster than COUNT (*)2, if there is a primary key, then the primary key (Union primary key) as the count of the condition is also faster than
Execution effect:
1. Count (1) and COUNT (*) when the table has a larger amount of data, using count (1) is more time-consuming than using count (*) when analyzing the table. From the execution plan, the effect of count (1) and COUNT (*) is the
For more information about bugs fixed in SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 4, click the following article number to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:314128 FIX: When an RPC call is performed, Access with conflicting values includes an
Count (1) compared to count (*):
If your data table does not have a primary key, then count (1) is faster than COUNT (*)
If there is a primary key, then the primary key (the Federated primary key) as the count condition is also faster than
After encountering this problem, the first reaction is caused by the number of columns, but I check the SQL, found that the number of columns is the same, but the insertion is still a problem, and then write a simple SQL Insert is not empty field,
35. use SQL query analyzer and SQL profilerUse SQL query AnalyzerUse SQL profilerOptimize T-SQL statementSummaryIn this chapter, we will continue with the description of the pre-stored procedures in Chapter 21st. This chapter describes how to use
SQL Server insert efficiency (heap table vs clustered index table)
"Which of the following is more efficient for SQL Server insert operations in heap tables or clustered index tables? Why is it high ?"
Some colleagues have asked me this question
MS SQL Server Query optimization methodThere are many reasons for the slow speed of queries, which are common1, no indexes, or no indexes (this is the most common problem with query slowness, is the flaw in programming)2, I/o throughput is small,
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.