Complete version with link:
Http://files.cnblogs.com/lovecindywang/.net.pdf
Http://files.cnblogs.com/lovecindywang/j2ee.pdf
The open-source and non-open-source platforms (of course, Many of Microsoft's products are also open-source) differ greatly from the following:
- There are indeed many good open-source products, but the quality is also uneven. The compatibility of different products in different versions is also a problem.
- Non-Open SourceCommunityThe contribution is relatively small, and the product compatibility of Microsoft's product line is good, but a single family is also prone to insufficient community enthusiasm.
Note:
- Spring cannot be seen in the J2EE diagram, and IIS cannot be seen in the. NET diagram. If you have some consensus, you will not mention it.
- Here, we will not compare who is better or worse, but just list some keywords that can be thought of during architecture design.
- This figure is made up of J2EE and copied and pasted to. net, so the classification of. NET is actually a bit strange.
(This figure cannot cover all aspects of development in a rush. It just lists representative frameworks within the scope of personal knowledge points. Please forgive me and continue to supplement it. You are welcome to make it a new one)