Attitudes towards learning and research

What do you get if you read only the disadvantages? The British philosopher bacon also warned: "When reading a book, it cannot be difficult for the author ." Some people like to argue, but it is a pity to give up the opportunity to absorb nutrition from each other (whether a person or a book) in order to argue. If you don't always see the advantages of the other party and benefit yourself from it, can you stay at a certain level without improving your performance?
Whether the argument is correct or not, the conversation is only intended to act as a competitor, but only to successfully express opposition to victory. The purpose of reading a reader in this spirit is to find out what he can oppose. For those who want to argue with each other, they will always find the cause of the debate, whether you want to argue with him or not. However, if he realizes that the real benefit of talking is that he can learn something, and if he realizes that he wants to win the debate, he only needs to gain knowledge first, rather than defeat others, he will know that meaningless arguments are useless.
Of course, this does not mean that we cannot express different opinions or point out others' mistakes. We just mean that we should be prepared to agree with others as we are prepared to oppose others.