Beijing Fa Yuan Temple

The company posted this book, which also gave a sense of post-reading experience, a headache, because the content is too heavy and too rich to understand.

The clues in this book are basically centered on the main line of the reform pioneer Kang Youwei. Comrade Kang Youwei presided over a lot of discussions on Buddhist concepts with fayuan Temple. The Buddhist study written by Li Yu is always regarded as a tool. When reading four books, five classics, or even a very advanced foreign language book at that time, he can use the "Buddha" to understand things and life. It is like philosophy, but some Buddhist concepts are higher than philosophy. With the Buddha's container, Kang Youwei's life-long learning is more intelligent. Thoughts always recognize things in different ways. The depth of understanding lies in the richness of knowledge.

There are a lot of points in this book. It's a bit messy. I 'd like to remember a journal account first, and I haven't written anything for too long.

1. Path Selection of historical figures in the period of change. Kang -- Reform School, Tan -- as the end of the reform school, Liang -- reform first and then reform later. Tan's heroic martyrdom is the essence of the book. In order to warn the world of its reform path, we are willing to give a warning to the world. This is the path of a great sage. Many classic cases about death and Tan's death are even more distinctive. Two foreign giants and two wise Chinese men. They have achieved true meaning, and the meaning of death is more lofty and more admired.

2. Buddhist discussion in books. As mentioned above, Buddhism is a tool and a container in this book. They are brought together through the Buddhist views of all pioneers. In addition, it is said that they have been sublimated through their actions. Even Mr. Yu joined the WTO. The endurance of a person does not mean that he will be born forever and will not compete, but will have a bigger goal, a greater ambition, and a greater revenge. Being born is the realm of mortals, and the holy people will join the WTO after being born. The path is the path, and the road is the road to lead others.

3. The clue character is Liang, but the central character is tan. After reading the complete book, I feel that Liang's current and departure are just paving the way for tan. On the one hand, Tan's death is too great, its meaning is too deep, and on the other hand, Tan's general people do not have the narrow sense spirit. Although I have not told too much about the narrow sense, I feel deeply rooted in the hearts of the people. Maybe it's just my personal feeling.

4. The choice of political means determines the success or failure of things. If the three pioneers and one emperor want to change one China, they just feel that the means are still poor. Indeed, under the national conditions at that time, what we needed was to change China's backward situation, but we had to sadly see that in China it was not "out of the box" and it seemed impossible to do anything. Now it seems that Chiang Kai-shek's policy is ridiculous and shameful. But as a politician, it cannot be said that his policy is incorrect. This policy seems feasible in the age of the Wuxi variable. Because the implementation of the variable will inevitably bring about this resistance. However, under the premise of the Chinese monarchy, there is still a possibility of reform, that is, the "ruling" Emperor can do it. Poor Guangxu: they want to do different things and do not interfere with each other. In the hope that Cixi will let them live, the result is that Cixi has given a dead end. Guangxu is a good emperor, as Tan said, not for his own wealth, but indeed for the country. It is a pity that Good Emperors cannot do good things, but they still cannot do good things. Some Buddhist standards do not do good things, so you are not good people. If we replace Guangxu with Kangxi, and change it to a different situation in China, for example, if we are the one who has the political power and weakness of the calendar. Unfortunately, there are no assumptions in history.

5. What Kang said is the inevitable path. To be honest, there are not many people who can see through this situation. Although the constitutional monarchy did not pass, we have seen the shadow of the monarchy from the Qing Dynasty to the present. From Yuan Shikai to Beiyang warlord to Chiang Kai-shek's Republic of China, there are almost any shadows of democracy. In time, democracy is still a piece of talk. No one takes it seriously. The upper layer does not take it seriously, and everyone is playing it. The principle of being human is to take precedence over others. However, it is ridiculous that although there is a legacy of history, it takes its dregs to its essence. When the people in charge want to change what they do, they either make a serious injury to history, or they are shackled by democracy. As a result, it becomes a waste of water and cannot be updated. The idea of Kang is very simple. If the people of Ming Dynasty are happy and the people of Ming Dynasty are miserable, the former is the driving force while the latter is the resistance. He hoped the system could change. However, if the path to democratization is not open to the people and the rights are scattered, nothing will be done. I believe that if the law of reform can be implemented under such circumstances, its achievements will surpass those of Zhang juzheng Wang Anshi, and this will be a rare opportunity for many years. If not, the water will never be clear. If not, a new atmosphere will be created. If the new era cannot be a new one, it will become a joke of history and be pressed under the wheel.