After spending one months reading a very large number of "Dream Break Code", I deeply realized
By one o'clock--all programmers are "lunatics" on a level of definition, they're all for software,
The code is going to be stuck in it, but it's a bunch of geeks who have always been optimists, and if I'm going to express my feelings,
I would think that such a waste of energy, a waste of youthful things will be done by someone,
What the hell is wrong with them, ""
But now, as a computer professional college student, I can only say to myself, you are not
They will not become them, I know that I do not have that ability, not everyone is fit to do
Software development, I am not that piece of material "", because now I have at least contacted C,c++,java
such as the fur of machine language, each language is so laborious, "dream Break Code"
is about the long and painful development process of Chandler Software, in which a series of
Questions to test their program enthusiasts, at that moment really feel that should sympathize with him
For a moment, in the Osaf Development group, you are solely responsible for selecting other programmers to create software
Part of the "system architect" Anderson is faced with: What language should be written
Code? What tools should be used to create the graphical interface of the program? What software should be used
Technology to store program data? What kind of data exchange standards should be used? Wait one after another difficult
To choose the situation, it makes me feel that the software is so abstract.
Dream Break Code 1