Eight important issues in writing papers in Libraries

In the thesis writing, we should not leave the theory out of reality. Leaving practice theory is "lying", and leaving theory to talk about practice is "pretending to be ". In the absence of the same classification environment in China, some people have begun to scale the number of books... . The number cannot be the same or the same. [2] the idea of having to leave the book number in a realistic discussion is purely a way of reasoning and teaching without practical significance; "In the recording project growth zip code imaginary", is a model of the "loading", it opens the books and contents of the subject to the arm, alone "to facilitate readers to contact with the publishing club or the editorial department or the author of the paper, and make their own passion. This is an unrealistic assumption.

Second, let alone the truth. For example, an author understands the conditions for network and resource sharing: "without the same scale style, databases cannot be exchanged, and resources cannot be shared ." 40 indeed, cloud computing has not yet achieved computer networking or has achieved computer networking, but in an environment where style is not peeled off, it is not a rough idea to borrow from each other, the "General debit card" system that has been tested in some regions is also the currency reality. This is just as silly as saying "people will die hungry without food. In the CNMARC style, neither the number nor the classification number of books require the same scale, and the database created here is a bibliography database, even if the network is realized. it can only share bibliography data, rather than full-text data. If you want to use a document of XX, You have to obtain the original text by other means (such as mailing or picking the door. This is the root cause.

Third, we should avoid far-fetched conferences and subjective speculation. For example, an author assumes that the "Chinese author-shaped Book Number" has the following advantages. ② It is suitable for troubleshooting and identification to facilitate smooth handling. ③ You do not need to look up the table. For more information, see the word "give. ④ Numbers are simple and examples. 5 is easy to be familiar with and used by readers, which is conducive to literature search. In theory, no matter what the author number is, there are only three "strengths"-the scale, the same authors of the treaty and the large amount of literature. But there is no need for the practical significance of the book number scale-based investment. Using the author's number as the book number has a fatal defect, but it has been leaked. It is probably intentionally avoided, that is, to list similar books in a string, the separation and layout of books are constantly changing. The necessity of the treaty-based authors literature is important, other Books of the same kind with scientific knowledge do not need to be co-authored. The principle is very simple. The author has made some private editors or co-edited several "Botany" Books (non-version differences). In addition to the similar content, how much else is the cost of use? The author number is the same, that is, the "duplicate number ". it is necessary to add the books that help medical operators to differentiate differences, which makes the number of authors and manipulation more and more huge; "Large Capacity" is like a child wearing a big shoe-not practical. According to the actual number of Collection types (non-number of books) in each library and the environment of the 104 exhibition, the number of types of target books in each category is limited, and the number of types can reach three places (999, it can be up to four bits (9999. The layout of the author's number is like the five-level category of the Chinese Library method. The layout is getting poorer, and the code of the author's number and the classification number are mixed, which makes readers have no clue.

Avoid being partial. For example, if an author is self-concealed by cloud: "No matter what kind of number taking essentials are accepted, the duplicate signs of the book number cannot be stopped ".~ 61.

5. Avoid using cloud and cloud. For example, the author said at the end of the article: "In the document processing system, the uniqueness of the document type has been determined by the ISBN number. the uniqueness of each document can also be understood by the property number. Here, when determining whether the book number is to be obtained, you only need to exaggerate the individual method of the document, that is, the low weight rate. It is not necessary to exaggerate the uniqueness of the document ." 7O cloud said, even if the number is heavy, it does not matter because of the difference between the ISBN number and the property number. However, the contact between the ISBN and the imaginary book number of the author is unknown to the reader. in academic research, I am not afraid of cloud-based practices. For example, many articles issued by the authors over the past few years on the informatization, marketization, enterprise, and property of libraries in China are the "excellent structure" of the cloud ". As Yang yuansheng pointed out in J, "library informatization and other viewpoints analysis": "library informatization, marketization, enterprise, property, and other viewpoints, it is a manifestation of the absence of theory from practice, and a non-correct style of study. It is proposed by the author at will in the absence of in-depth arguments and justification, therefore, it is difficult to generate practical application results because it does not have examples and scientific knowledge."

Avoid unclear opinions and data errors. For example, an author wrote in his article "talking about journal cable number": "the acceptance of such a number for a rack number does not have any search effect ." (91 anyone who has learned knowledge from the library knows that the rack number is also called the slogan (Journal) number, the complete layout number should include the classification number, the book (Journal) number and the help division number, but the author shares the layout number with the book number; an author observes Chen v. ll planing in an article. 145 useful answers were received, and the four tables listed in this article. the data and results are full of errors. We don't have to extract an example to illustrate it. In "table I's familiarity with the library", three sub-items are set up. The observation result of "the library collection environment" is as follows: 43 people are known, accounting for 2966%; 84 people were not familiar, accounting for 57.93%; 23 people were not familiar, accounting for 15.8%. The total number of I users is 150, and the sum of percentages is 103.39%.

7. avoid mistakes and incorrect texts. For example, an author said in the previous article: "In this process, the Classification Number and layout number (which should be the journal number, which I note) should be specific to itself, it uses code to show the sequence relationship between the subject attributes of a journal and the journal variety, and does not need to be distinguished by year or period." In the latter article, the author said: "Because there are differences between different types of journals under the same discipline, some characteristics of journals should be used to form code. shows the sequential relationship between different types of journals." (1t3 is one of the characteristics of each type of journal in terms of publication year and period. How can this problem be distinguished by year or period? In addition to the classification number and the number of the publication, how can we conduct a retrospective search if the number (such as the year of the publication, the number of the publication, or the number of the publication) is not helpful? An article published by an author entitled "existing questions and Countermeasures of the current focused journals". However, this article argues that it is not the subject and Countermeasures of the focused journals. it is the object of the focused Journal-the questions and Countermeasures for developing the focused journal.

Do not write more than one draft. Multiple posting of a draft not only wastes the human, material, and financial resources of the editorial department, but also makes readers very disgusted. The author should be self-confident, self-loving, and self-disciplined, and more considerate for the editorial department and readers. The editorial departments should also enhance mutual assistance and handling, so as to prevent multiple login of one draft.

,

Source http://www.writehelp.cn/static-20140722-900-1.html

Source URL http://www.writehelp.cn