I want to change jobs, but I feel embarrassed.

A person who has been serving the company for more than ten years is also an old employee. But now he is facing a dilemma. Is it time to change jobs? Or keep it?

We have to start with the reason. Since the Department changed a new leadership, the Department structure has changed. After graduating from college, I entered the company, talked about it, liked the programming industry, and liked the logic in it. Therefore, I am also a typical technical man, just like all technical men, focus on implementing business processes, implementing various technologies, and trying new technologies. Although old leaders are not engaged in technology, they are especially respectful and honest. Here we use the word integrity, because I feel like I am also such a person. Technically, we can discuss things. So everyone gets along very well.

Now the leaders have changed and the women have changed. Although the technology is born, to tell the truth, it is really a mess of bad technology. It is strange to everyone that such a person can be a leader? Now I have been thinking about this problem. In her words, this leadership position is what she strives. The question is how to win. The technology is too technical-focused, and women are really the kind of people who are willing to play. I have read the ghost story and I know how terrible the real-world women are.

Let's talk about the story in reality.

First, we will describe the background. The company is an enterprise mainly engaged in production and manufacturing. It started earlier in the informatization of enterprises. Many management systems are self-built systems, which can well meet the operational development of enterprises.

The first thing she did when she came to power was to change her mind. It was very simple. Because of her poor technology, the Department's positioning had changed and it was no longer the independent development of software systems. This reason seems reasonable, however, the next series of practices make people vomit. Why do I keep some technical staff? For her, it was a waste and she had to try her best to get rid of it. As a result, she left a large number of programmers at her tenure. She has a lot of skills to get rid of programmers. For example, if you are not able to develop, you can develop a process manager for one month to configure various enterprise processes, the system will be able to run, and you will be alone. I rely on it, isn't it forcing others to fight against it? If you are really rebellious, she will go to the big leaders and tell you something, don't listen to the arrangement, don't obey the work, and say to you directly: what do you want to do? Now everyone understands that there is one set of leaders in front of them, and one set of leaders behind their backs. I am not used to this style of technology.

Secondly, it's really like what you think in gongxinji. It's very good at picking everyone up. Let's become a project leader. Let's create a project for you and arrange several people. I want to tell you who the project team members listen to when the project team is doing this, and secretly speaking to the project team members? Can you ask the project team members to follow your responsibilities? Obviously, no. If she doesn't do that, then she will say to you, why don't you follow the original instructions? Do you mean nothing when I speak? Naturally, the conflict between you and the members of the project team cannot be solved. when the project is settled at the end, the contribution of the project members can be played around, making you irrelevant.

There are too many such cases, and there are countless numbers of such cases. The programmer just went on one after another. She was so happy that she took the opportunity to recruit a large number of developers who knew a little bit about the technology, why are these people recruited? Introduce a project. In this way, she also said before the big leaders that it is difficult to recruit technical staff, the level of technical staff is not good, and the company's existing systems are lagging behind. In fact, the company's system has been running normally, and she can't beat her own mouth, so she has a wrist, how to do it, the solution is not after technical personnel research, according to the enterprise process, she wants to have a hearing. She wants to conduct a command and say that you cannot conduct research in this place. The process needs to be changed. The design in that place is unreasonable, it can be imagined that the system is slowly being changed by her, and the Department is uncomfortable to use and requires a change. As a result, a simple process and simple management functions become complicated, everyone understands that the efficiency is not high, and she has the opportunity to go to the big leaders to say that they have low development efficiency, unstable systems, and so on. To put it bluntly, it is to prepare for the introduction of the system.

The above are just some cases of her strategy and calculation. Of course, there are also some narrow-minded cases, which are really the characteristics that a bad woman can have, after more than ten years of work, I was the first to meet such a bad-looking woman.

What we will talk about below is completely complete and thorough, which determines the essence of this woman's bad.

Are you wondering why the system is introduced? Why?

When I ask this question, you may understand that introducing a system is a matter of relationship between Party A and Party B, that is, transactions with suppliers, it is no less popular than Tiger flies. Black transactions are really handy for such a woman. For example, if she wants to introduce a system from a, she will let you examine similar systems on the market, let you produce a series of analysis reports, write them again, it was not until the analysis report you wrote said that the system of a was good that she would be satisfied. She never said that she would not leave a handle and then show it to the big leaders. You see, this is the analysis report made by the technicians below. That is to say, what system should we introduce? What system should the technicians analyze? What system can't be used up with her, she and a must have had a good deal of negotiation, and then like a decent walk in the bidding process. In fact, she told a all the information, and the others who came to the bidding team went through the bid.

There are too many such cases.

Is it meaningful for me to stay in such an enterprise now?

After more than ten years of work, I became a home and went away. This means I am looking for a new job and I feel that I still have some abilities. However, I have not changed my job for more than ten years, I really don't know what the market is like. Don't leave, stay here, the salary in the local area is not low, it is not high, but in the face of such a power play, play means, play the mind, but also very greedy, bad moral leadership, I really don't have any passion for work,

How can I choose whether to stay or not?