"Leetcode" 204-count Primes

Description:count the number of prime numbers less than a non-negative number, n.

Hint:

2. Let's start with a isprime function. To determine if a number is the prime, we need to check if it isn't divisible by any number less than n.  The runtime complexity ofIsPrime function would is O (n) and hence counting the total prime numbers n would be O (n2). Could We do better?

4. As we know the number must not being divisible by no number > n /2, we can immediately cut the total iterations Half by dividing-up to n /2. Could we still do better?

5. Let's write down all of the factors:

   2x6 = 123x4 = 124x3 = 126x2 = 12

   As can see, calculations of 4x3 and 6x2 is not necessary. Therefore, we only need to consider factors up to√n because, if n are divisible by some number P then n = p x Q and since p ≤ Q, we could derive that p ≤√n .

   Our total runtime have now improved to O (n1.5), which is slightly better. Is there a faster approach?

    public int countprimes (int n) {int count = 0;   for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) {if (IsPrime (i)) count++; } return count;}   Private boolean isprime (int num) {if (num <= 1) return false; Loop ' s ending condition is i * I <= num instead of i <= sqrt (num)//To avoid repeatedly calling an expensive F   Unction sqrt ().   for (int i = 2; I * i <= num; i++) {if (num% i = = 0) return false; } return true;} 

7. The sieve of Eratosthenes is One of the most efficient ways to find all Prime numbers up to  n . But don ' t let that name scare you, I promise that the concept is surprisingly simple.

   
   Sieve of eratosthenes:algorithm steps for primes below 121. "Sieve of Eratosthenes Animation" By skopp is licensed UNDER CC by 2.0.

   We start off with a table of  n  numbers. Let's look at the first number, 2. We know all multiples of 2 must is not being primes, so we mark them off as Non-primes. Then we look at the next number, 3. Similarly, all multiples of 3 such as 3x2 = 6, 3x3 = 9, ... must not being primes, so we mark them off as well. Now we look at the next number, 4, which is already marked off. What is does this? Should you mark off all multiples of 4 as well?

9. 4 is not a prime because it's divisible by 2, which means all multiples of 4 must Also is divisible by 2 and were already marked off. So we can skip 4 immediately and go to the next number, 5. Now, all multiples of 5 such as 5x2 = ten, 5x3 =, 5x4 =, 5x5 = ... can be marked off. There is a slight optimization here, we don't need to start from 5x2 = 10. Where should we start marking off?

11. In fact, we can mark off multiples of 5 starting at 5x5 = $, because 5x2 = Ten was already marked off by multiple of 2 , similarly 5x3 = 3 is already marked off by multiple of. Therefore, if the current number is p, we can always mark off multiples of p starting at P2, Th En in increments of p: P2 + p, P2 + 2p, ... Now what should is the terminating loop condition?

13. It's easy to say the terminating loop condition are p < n, which is certainly correct and not EF Ficient. Do you still remember Hint #3?

15. Yes, the terminating loop condition can is p <√n, as all non-primes≥√n must has already been marked off. When the loop is terminates, all of the numbers in the table is non-marked is prime.

1 classSolution {2  Public:3     4     intCountPrimes (intN) {5         if(n<=2)return 0;6         intCount=0;7vector<BOOL> IsPrime (N,true);8     9          for(intI=2; i<n;i++){Ten             if(Isprime[i]) { Onecount++; A                  for(Long LongJ= (Long Long) i*i;j<n;j+=i)//two longlong necessary, otherwise it will run-time error, when I is large, i*i out of int range -isprime[(int) j]=false; -             } the         } -         returncount; -     } -    +};

"Leetcode" 204-count Primes