Moore's law "will survive 100 again". Is parallel programming so important?

Saidi's message. I don't know if it's true? If so, is parallel programming so important?

Herb Suter wrote the famous article 《The free lunch is over: A Fundamental turn toward concurrency in Software", Put forward the point of view that parallel programming is the future direction, ptc06 above saw his speech talking about some of the VC team's research progress on concurrency. HS at that timeArticleIt is based on the invalidation of Moore's law. If this assumption cannot be established now, Will concurrency's attention be omitted? Of course, the work done by VC team and other research work on parallel programming are still very valuable. Aside from Moore's Law, after all, multi-threaded programming itself is a complicated and sometimes sweaty job. If we can improve the current lame multi-threaded programming model in terms of language and library, it makes sense!