Website optimization question three: false original article why not be included

SEO on the optimization of a lot of questions and answers, before we talked about "new station why not be included" and "website snapshots Why not update", today, I would like to say more about the false original topic, false original is to do the station's favorite way to update the site, but some people's false original by the search engine greatly like, and some but not a collection, Why is the difference so big? We read the news every day, should be a very similar news, why the search will be included so many, some of itself just changed the title, the contents of the same is still included, and ranked well, why? The author summarizes the following false original content is not included in the reasons.

1, false original traces are too obvious. The general false original is to change the head or paragraph upside down, as long as others have seen similar to know the content of this article, the nature of the user stay time is very short, and search lead will be judged as garbage content.

2. Low weight of website. If you envy some of the great stations to change the title of the false original is included and a good ranking, in fact, the most important is that he has a high weight of the impact of a high weight of the site even if the false original or acquisition will get good rankings, because of his high weight, search cited early to invest a lot of trust. And your reason for not being included is because the weight is too low.

3, the readability is not high. Many webmaster can not know how to analyze the readability, the author to a small coup, that is, through statistical tools to query the time of the page, the longer the time to explain the content of the user is readable, and vice versa is not readable. Search will be based on this to judge, especially equipped with Baidu statistics site.

4, the content similarity degree is high. Since it is false original, then that is the original network of this type of article, and a few, nature does not include the reason is because the search has been known to have this article exists, so will not be included in your.

So for these artifacts are not included in the original, how to solve it? The author of his five years of optimization experience summed up the solution:

1, reduce the similarity of content. We first use tools to query their own modified page content and the same content on the network similarity, I recommend the use of Similarity query tool, as long as the similarity to lower than 50%, then search will be judged as original, natural will be included.

2, improve the page stay time. For this point many webmasters may not know how to improve, I suggest you in the content of the page, the content of the paragraph to be divided, the best is a paragraph not more than five elements, so that is conducive to user reading at the same time to improve the length of the page is very useful, don't believe you can try

3, improve the weight of the site. The general weight of the site even if the false original will be included, as for why, the author believes that the high weight of the site are searched for the trust, and the search will be optimized to grasp the content of high weight, natural evaluation rankings are the weight of the priority.

4, the elimination of false original traces. This is very important, for search and user two aspects to do a good job, the elimination of the main method is to see some users know is repeated part of the removal, such as an article do not just change the end of the head, should be the first paragraph to be divided, sorted, and then the article page, preferably backwards and forwards, Let the user not at a glance is false original or duplicate content.

For the false original article is not included in the question, the author is here. In fact, false original relative to the original strength is not enough, but more than the acquisition content is much stronger, after all, false original if modified properly, search cited and users are very like, and for the increase is a good choice. But can original words as far as possible write original, after all this kind of article will not produce not be included in the situation. This article by the Emergency Clothing (www.jf59.com) exclusive feeds, A5 starting, reproduced please specify, thank you!