Word implements a summary comparison of various scenarios

16.6 Summary comparison of various schemes

The following "ideal ①" corresponds to 16.1 knots, and so on. The following "deficiencies, flaws, hidden dangers" is stated in 16.3.14, 16.4.16. Word refers to the "Word 2007 citation and bibliography" feature; Ku Hong "refers to my own set of 5 macros; e/r/Wang refers to "Endnote, Reference Manager, (medical) Literature King". In addition, nonsense: the "pure Manual Method" is not included as a comparison:.

Also want to explain: I to "e/r/King" know very shallow, may say the fundamental wrong, forgive me:.

Table 16 1 Summary comparison of various schemes

Note: [1] only returns to the "parent" number. [2] See the 16.3.13 section, so use √-to evaluate:. [3] with-√-(instead of X) to their own macro paste point "gold" bar, because, after all, I can from the PubMed, China Wanfang and other documents database search documents, copy → Paste over. [4] Relatively speaking, e/r/did can do these two points. But after all, to guide the literature from the Internet into a specialized library, the process is not too easy, so give a √-. [5] At present, Word offers too few ready-made styles, so give a √-.

Note : More wonderful tutorials Please pay attention to the triple computer Tutorials section, triple Office group: 185219299 welcome you to join