A hard topic for programmers in the workplace

2006.06.30 from: csdn talent channel Li Yan Core

The light is still lit every night, responsible for the full copy of the work, facing the absurd endure and then endure, always more tolerant sacrifice, knowing that it is impossible to force themselves to support, the more boring, the more boring the more cold the heart is, the more hurt it is.

The EMC secretary is booming, and the president of the HP employee dialogue is on the rise. Employees think they are angry and wronged. The boss thinks that the employee is not loyal and cares about it. In the workplace, employees and bosses are on the opposite sides. Both parties leave each other and think they are the most injured.

The recruitment information of technical developers often says, familiar with XXXXX environment; proficient in XX language programming; proficient in XX programming; Understanding XX, skilled in using XXX software engineering tools and software; understanding of xxxx system; experience in XXX projects.

What is proficient? Generally, the definition of "proficient" by The recruiter is different from that in the programmer's eyes. "Why can I write skills in recruitment but cannot write skills in job search?" the programmer lamented: "in the final analysis, one is to test the self-confidence of job seekers, and the other is to lower your salary at a high level ."

During job search. One copy after another. At the same time, I received several interview invitations. During interviews with HR, I first learned more about the company and talked about the company's business prospects, I talked about the development environment of my work, my personal development space, and my salary. During the interview, the two sides made a great deal of discussion. Once money was involved, they were all involved and immediately confronted each other, "bargaining", and even finally "disallow ".

The three-month trial period has passed, and the project development on hand is also in progress as scheduled. There is no such thing as the supervisor, and there is no news on the top. Should I try it again? If you don't want to give me a question, you can find another way out. If you don't want to, you can continue to use it. If you want to do so, you are still trying to get a try, and you have to pay less for it? What is it like? Don't drag it around like this.

More difficult to understand, less to do than not do. I did a lot of work and learned a lot, but it would be better to leave early and be late. Some people who are not knowledgeable and knowledgeable about what to do and want to ask him where to do something wrong, after five minutes, I said, "There is no time. You can go back and think about the solution ".

"One screw is charged at only $1, and the remaining $999 is how to find the screw's reward." is the process of finding a screw useless and negligible? The results are simple, but the process is not easy. "Please do not use technical ignorance to measure my technical level. When I am a migrant ".

Why do we always remember what we used to do when we had to leave: overtime without payment, failures, on-call, and the application of new development technologies, if you don't want to go to school on holidays ......

It is not in direct proportion to development. Wages and training should make people see Hope, the future, and the bright future, so developers can study harder and make continuous progress, this is the most positive attitude of developers. Isn't the company's path further and wider? People cannot leave meals, clothes, and transportation and housing. This is a realistic and objective problem. "One shot and two scattered" is only the final choice. The development of the company depends on the development of products and product workers. The software market is not very good now. Is it difficult for the company's capital accumulation to be partially transferred to employee wages?

But recruitment companies do not know: Why are you bargaining with me? Ask here, if there is a company interviewing you, you will feel that you are a talent? An interview is sent by phone, but 1000 and 2000 cannot be seen. For the time being, we will not talk about the long term. For the time being, how can the company know that your capabilities are not worth 10 thousand, or more in just a few hours, the company also needs to survive, and it also depends on the money of the person who develops. How much will we pay? How can I trust you without doing anything?

The company does not ignore and waste talents. Our starting point is to recruit truly appropriate talents. Which company does not want to do its best to stay in the company. To help new employees get started and integrate into the project team, the company's investment is far more than investing in old employees.

When most of the interviews come up, how much is the salary? Which one is more important for money and development?

Let's take a look at the market. Don't always blame the company for this. It's not good, how the conditions are, how hard the work is, how much money it is, but not how it can be done. Think about it, what makes it harder to get more than others? Every opportunity in this industry is an opportunity for success. Every missed opportunity is a possibility of failure. Only those who face every opportunity seriously will succeed.

If you want to make money, you have to pay. If you don't pay anything, you won't get a return. When a boss tells you 1000 yuan, please first think about it, why did he give you 1000 yuan, because in his heart, you are not worth 5000 yuan, let yourself change the value, let the boss see, not you tell the boss that you are worth the money, it is possible to get it after hard work. Don't let others get the money? If others have already paid, they will be rewarded. If you have not yet paid, why is it better than those who have worked hard?

How to conduct benign interaction, how do developers and companies share their respective "abacus" and how do they integrate with each other to achieve long-term development in this industry? From different perspectives, objective analysis from both sides is the basic premise.

There is a different point of view to be discussed.