Throughout this series of ramble will not cling to the Penrose analysis, er only reverie artificial intelligence optimistic possibility and approximate path.
Some piecemeal views.
"The ultimate Problem"
The ultimate Scientific (philosophical) issue of today's human/universe is considered to be two questions:
1. Ontological Problems of physical reality
2. Intelligent limit Problem
These two problems are most likely to be related or even the same. In this position, science (including mathematics) and philosophy will merge together.
"Approximate road Map"
A possible approximate roadmap for human beings in the direction of intelligence singularity:
Current (weak AI and its various applications)--pseudo-singularity (jungle)--true singularity.
In this potentially pseudo-base point area, many things can happen now that you can't imagine. And the pseudo-singularity has no obvious boundary in time and space. Even if the current stage (which will be a long period of history) such as and transition into the pseudo-singularity jungle, can not imagine.
The fate of human beings in pseudo-singular points and the human destiny after the true singularity are of course not conclusive at present.
As with almost all the problems here, this route is just a daydream. Exactly how the route, of course, depends on the physical structure of the intelligent singularity crossing.
"Pragmatism Machine"
The Pragmatism machine (in honor of the American pragmatism philosopher John Dewey, which is known throughout as "Du Wei") is a special kind of artificial intelligence, which does not in all respects compare and surpass human beings (typically such as art, aesthetics, human morals, etc.), And in the context of their own system to achieve beyond human intelligence and its evolution of a class of artificial intelligence mechanisms. The attainment of this transcendence is ultimately tangible, including, for example, physical warfare, elimination and victory, and, obviously, generally for the shared physical environment (the universe as a whole). The pragmatism machine is likely to be the minimization of strong (super) AI implementations, but whether so this is not strictly justified.
"Humanoid AI and Superman artificial intelligence or pragmatism machine is the most difficult problem."
There is no thought in this. This problem is also an artificial intelligence topic fuzzy problem, one of the pitfalls is how to define the degree of personification. Of course, the general idea of personification here is to reach the human mode of thinking, or even to reproduce the human thinking pattern, and to achieve a human immortality has been conceived of a "singularity."
"Free Will"
The philosophical/scientific discussion of strong AI has no shortage of free will, as well as other issues. Because "free will" itself is what, what role, is people also do not understand the philosophical problem. Throughout from the perspective of pragmatism, the behavior of the take-up will be in trouble, but a similar desire/instinctive motive is needed. Similar to human beings, "survival and development" may be a candidate. As to how survival and development and other possible options are unknown.
"Some of the possible machines that are already being discussed"
Fast machine: Think like people, but faster than people;
Parallel machines: Thinking like people, but massively parallel, human can not catch up;
Smart machines: Smarter than people in every way.
The three kinds of robots that some of the scientists have envisioned above, though, have little meaning to discuss. Because these three are probably the simple assumptions that these scientists have made when they are not quite clear about the present and future nature and nature of artificial intelligence. Belong to the comparison pattern Tucson broken, on stage to take clothes.
"As the man making the machine."
It is suggested that man may be the most stupid natural creature capable of making artificial intelligence, and there is no objection at all, at least not to be noncommittal.
"Artificial Intelligence and human-to-animal relations"
It has been suggested that Superman AI and human relations may be similar to human and animal relations, all without objection, at least non-judgmental (this attitude will be used in many topics of artificial intelligence, indicating that as long as the body is not too tangled in the waste of time, This assertion does not clearly violate anything that has been repeatedly argued to be substantial.
All on July 14, 2015 think of strong AI