|
Number of objective evidence |
Rating |
Resource requirements |
Team Size |
Scampy A |
high-High |
Yes-has |
|
Large-Big |
is the most rigorous evaluation of the formal, the purpose is to obtain the evaluation level. A formal assessment team needs to be formed and an assessment team will be required by the SEI-authorized lead assessor. Evaluation method for document review and personnel interview, practice implementation of the situation is divided into: fi fully implemented-li most implementation of-PI partial implementation-ni not implemented ... The evaluation output is the final evaluation report, and the assessment results are registered with the SEI by the Director assessor. |
Each practice need to have a direct (document) evidence and an indirect (document or person) evidence |
Report rating results to SEI, and freely choose to publish. |
SEI Authorized Director Assessor Leadership Assessment |
Min. 4 or more |
SCAMPI B |
In medium- |
no-None |
|
In medium- |
The checked object can be a project or a series of related practices, all or part of the PAS process domain. |
According to the scope of the custom assessment to determine the evidence, each practice target achievement evaluation of red, yellow, green three execution status |
No rating, publicity |
A person with relevant knowledge and experience or lead assessor to implement |
No special rules |
SCAMPI C |
|
no-None |
low-Low |
small-Small |
The minimum can be checked against the performance of a practice, and the criteria for inspection and evaluation can be defined by the user. |
The evaluation object and scope can be selected at any level based on the evaluation purpose. |
No rating, publicity |
Members of the assessment team with relevant knowledge and experience |
No special rules |
|
|
|
|
|
Cmmi_scampy Evaluation Method