Both wurfl and 51degress.mobi use useragent to obtain specific models. Here we will discuss the differences and positioning of the two projects.
Wurfl learns from the official homepage that wurfl can obtain detailed information about the settings (very detailed, than 51degress.mobi ).
51degress.mobi can also obtain device information, but it is not as detailed as wrufl. However, 51degress.mobi has another function to determine whether it is a mobile phone. From this point, we can see that,
51degress.mobi is positioned to quickly identify the mobile phone and then perform the fastest processing. The library already has a complete jump mechanism. However, wurfl is not available. It is only implemented later.
Next let's take a look at 51degress.mobi's judgment on the mobile jump configuration.
You can configure it directly in Web. config. Very convenient!
Therefore, how can we select these two projects can only be actual needs and practical applications. I personally think that 51degress.mobi provides enough hardware models, although it is not as powerful as wurfl.