Pursuit and ideal

Shiber's speech aroused my thoughts on the pursuit and ideals. Here I want to share my thoughts with you.

One day, shiber came to visit his house and reminded me to work hard to stay young, but not to ignore the "Humanistic" behind him. if all things are separated from the "Humanistic" behind the scenes, it will be totally meaningless. Therefore, we should try our best to maintain communication with our family and friends after working hard, when doing things, you must think about what "humanities" are behind it.

ShiBo is a traditional Chinese medicine and martial artist with great cultural connotations. Therefore, what he says will inevitably be profound. I have been pondering his sentence for a while. I think what he calls "humanities" is not only a direct understanding of "Humanistic Spirit", but also a deeper understanding of "pursuit and ideal ".

There should be a lot of friends who know the story of "yugong Yishan". I think yugong is silly and naive when I see yugong digging mountains, but yugong feels that I know what I have done makes sense.

A friend who has read "soldier assault" should remember the plot of Xu sanduo paving the way. In the view of other comrades, he is doing a silly thing, But Xu sanduo himself thinks that, he is doing something meaningful.

From these two stories, we can see that the "pursuit and ideal" behind the scenes makes things meaningful. If there are simple things like "pursuit and ideal", it will also be meaningful, if you lose the "pursuit and ideal", then great achievements will be meaningless. In addition, we should not ignore the "humanities" behind this incident, whether we do things on our own or look at others.

The above two stories show the separation of things and the "humanities" behind things, and there is no way to see the nature of things. Let me give an example to illustrate what it will be like if we do things away from the "humanities" behind it.

I simply take my participation in product development as an example. To be a successful product, we must first have a clear product concept and pursuit. This is the "Humanistic" behind the product. if the people involved understand the pursuit and ideal of what they want to do and agree with this value, the work of this person will be very invested, and know what you are doing. On the contrary, if he is involved but cannot understand the meaning of the things to be done or has no common values, he will be uncomfortable in the team and confused about what he is doing, it may even impede the success of the product.

Product development is like this, and we do the same in other work or things. For example, if you are in a company, you must first understand what the company's philosophy is, and you must be able to accept this idea. Otherwise, it is difficult for you to do anything in this company, it is not only difficult to display but also uncomfortable.

As a technician, I found myself having problems with "doing it for purpose, using it for use. The symptom of this problem is that, to do things a, we need to implement technology B first, then the client will implement technology B, and then there are several possibilities: 1. the client found that technology B was very interesting and continued in-depth research; 2. the client finds that technology B is not good enough. It takes a long time to study technology c. After studying technology C, the client finds that technology D is enough, and the research D is gone. In short, the result is a delay, I even forgot to do things.

I think there should also be many friends in the blog Park who have the same problem as me. It is also a good thing to say that this problem is because it drives technicians to constantly improve themselves, it is not good because it makes technicians often unable to do the right thing, so the webmaster circle will think that none of the successful webmasters are technically good, this is because technology is often addicted to technology and forgets the ultimate goal of the technology you are using. It seems that the same is true.

Therefore, if what you do deviates from the original "goal", the final result will be a failure or a detour.

There is also a problem that arises from the product, that is, the meaning of a thing is when one thing is attended by many people or at the social level, is this meaning consistent with the values of the majority of people? If it is only consistent with the values of a few people, it will be rejected by the masses and it will be difficult to succeed, on the contrary, things will be supported by the masses and easy to succeed. As we call it, evangelists help, and those who do not do anything.

To sum up, we can summarize some truth.

We often need to review and review what we are doing, and whether we have deviated from our original "greatest sum of ideals ". We also need to constantly reflect on whether the most peaceful ideals are correct, whether the values can be accepted by people around us who participate in this matter, and whether they can be accepted by the public.

When we are confused, think about what we are pursuing. Is it wrong?

I think the purpose of his speech to me is to remind me that we must constantly reflect on ourselves and stick to the correct ideal to do things in order to achieve real success.