Misunderstandings about Firefox and IE

From: http://www.blogchina.com/today's cold blog

Misunderstandings about Firefox and IE
Don't compare IE with FF any more. Jun doesn't see anyone who initiates these posts comparing IE with FF, but Maxthon, greenBrowser and Other IE shell browsers (hereinafter referred to as "IE shell") are compared with FF, that is, they are concerned about ease of use rather than security. they don't care about security! They think that with Norton and Kaspersky, you can rest assured. therefore, we can use the reason "FF is more secure than IE" to convince them that they are pale and powerless. the final result is often that several FF Fans are arguing about security or W3C standards, and the topic initiators have long wondered where to cool.
Why are they using IE shells? Is it because of security issues? No, it's easy to use. What attracts them to this forum? It's an advertisement, a promotion, or a download ranking! The purpose of downloading FF is to compare it with the existing IE shell. Which one is easier to use? Which system consumes less resources? Have they cared about security issues? No!
They can go to this forum to ask questions about FF. This is a good phenomenon and they should find a way to keep them. as the Fans of FF, as the open source, it may be more concerned about security and freedom. but if we want
To measure their ideas, it is wrong. Guidance is the most important thing, so that they can understand FF's advantages from the "visible" and "tangible" aspects, they only see what's bad about W3C: webpage dislocation,
I can't play audio or video, but I can't see the W3C. I want them to use Maxthon, GreenBrowser, and so on (I don't like IE, they don't like IE, don't mention kernel, they don't want to know) and FF to browse a webpage similar to this:

Http://www.mozilla.org/start/1.0/demos/eagle-sun.html
Comparison, just like the appearance of a train in the past, we used a train to compare it with mabi. Let him see with his own eyes what a new technology is!

Full of extended FF, I will call it "FF shell Browser" to compare it with "IE shell Browser. back to the first sentence in this article, they compared the "IE shell Browser" with FF, just like the "FF shell Browser" with IE, in terms of ease of use, the former is better than the latter. so how many advantages does IE have if it doesn't have to be seen by comparing the bare FF and idea IE? (IE has obvious advantages in browsing non-standard pages, which is discussed below ). therefore, it is especially meaningful to recommend the integrated version or revised FF to keep these people, so that they can compare and I can go to the web page where the IE shell can go, however, the IE shell may not be able to see the effect on my browser! To make such web pages more, one by one, second, relying on a visionary web designer to design a webpage based on W3C standards by taking advantage of new technologies (or even deliberately making it look bad on IE shells but it looks cool on FF, in addition, the existing web pages gradually move closer to the standard. If we say that we love and hate FF, we will wait until we use Internet Explorer.
When you look at the shell, it's not the webpage content dislocation, or the magic effect of the new technology, so what you love and hate is not FF, but the IE shells!

To avoid misunderstanding between wording like "we" and "they" and cause another unnecessary debate, it is necessary to explain:
"We" doesn't mean that there are high technologies, just a general name of FFFans. Of course, there are also experts and cainiao. I only discovered the benefits of FF and hoped more people could use it. everyone wants software to be easier to use, but "we" are more concerned with security and freedom, I don't want to always be shadow by Microsoft (forgive me for using another non-neutral term here)
"They" do not mean cainiao either. Can we say that cainiao is the one who makes different voices in this forum? The world is full of people who use IE standards for Web pages. The world is full of people who use IE standards for Web pages. Are they all cainiao? People get together because they care about the software.

And (Clarification of W3C standards. It does not involve technology; it does not involve politics. It is just a metaphor ):
I hope that when I mention the W3C standard, it will not cause you a headache (because you once said, "The only advantage of FF is security, and I don't care about any non-standard standards, can I still view my webpage without a standard? "), I want to say:" You don't care about security, but you don't care about standards! "As you said, I really don't know how China has taken this step from the feudal authority. At that time, the so-called standard was the Emperor's standard, and the common people lived like this for thousands of years! Are you willing to live under such standards? Now, the fact standard of web pages is the IE standard, that is, Microsoft's standard... wait, here I think of a bridge section on the <big inner spying>: The man with no face beat the ox in the mountain with a hand on the officialdom, and all the people in the back fell, but he did not know anything. When Jia Yingge asked him if he had a pain, he said, "It really does not hurt at all. It seems quite comfortable. "I almost didn't laugh at me at the time ......

I have heard of such a sentence: first-class enterprises sell standards, second-class enterprises sell technology, and third-class enterprises sell products.
Only hate this standard does not belong to China. (it does not belong to Microsoft, but to the world)