Participants in Business Architecture seminars and keynote speeches

This afternoon, I attended the "Business architecture platform Seminar" (http://events2009.csdn.net/) held by csdn and gave a keynote speech on "Business Architecture of compound Applications.

In fact, this is mainly sponsored by www.justep.com. The "pyuan" and "K2" of our fans are just guests. There are four main speakers: Ma, Song xinglie, the starting General Manager, Xiao tie Dong, K2 China East China Technical Director, and Yan (Puyuan, Hu Great Wall ).

Ma Ke elaborated on the importance of architecture and the necessity for the business architecture platform to solve complex systems. He finally extended to the solution of this problem by using models. The following figure can be used to explain its meaning:

 

Song xinglie elaborated on the "Model Standard" and the X5 demonstration. The entire X5 model description system is as follows:

Xiao tiidong from k2 mainly elaborated on how K2 was implemented in a "simple" process, it also meets the needs of "analysis", "modeling", "design", "monitoring", "optimization", and "integration" features. The basic idea of K2 is to use process to organically combine form, information, policy, people, action, report, and event monitor. Using the natural integration features of K2 and MS Office, it makes it easier to process flow applications.

While I (yinhu 999, Hu Great Wall) mainly elaborated on "we should look at the Business Architecture from multiple dimensions", and elaborated on the application feature Requirements for the features of the future business architecture. The traditional idea of developing applications from the perspective of "isolated Applications" will inevitably lead to "isolated vertical Applications" in the future, which will hinder the upgrade and development of enterprise informatization and even lead to a waste of resources. The new business architecture platform and developed applications can: Reusable functional modules, easy to adjust, hot update, and distributed deployment. "Functional module reusability" seems to be a simple requirement, but it is very difficult to implement it.

Basically, we need to look at the "Business architecture" from at least the following five dimensions to truly help the customer solve the gap between business and IT.

 

Where,

The concept of "Business Service" is two aspects: Internal SaaS application trends of enterprises; and Soba applications (including compound applications ).

The Concept stated in "business model" is "It is easier for business personnel to participate in the adjustment of business applications"

 

The above is a brief summary of the speech content of each guest today. The following is my personal experience of attending the seminar today:

========================================================== ======
I think the biggest achievement today is to have a deeper understanding of some concepts of starting X5. Unfortunately, I have to listen to my speech today, so I am sorry that I cannot personally experience the demo of X5 outside the venue.

The standards adopted and supported by models in X5 are roughly as follows (some of them are not yet supported, for example, BPMN is not yet supported ).

 

In fact, owl solves the problem described by the "meta-model. However, the biggest problem currently is "too advanced ". Mainstream application vendors do not yet support owl. In addition, although W3C is pushing the owl and semantic web, it is a pity that there is little thunder and rain. without the support of major manufacturers, it is difficult to make a fundamental change.

Therefore, it is difficult to estimate the direct value of the owl meta-model system in a short period of time to bring to the start. In fact, the customer does not need to pay attention to this concept.

 

However, for "Semantic Web", I still have a lot of "confusions", or I can say that I have not understood it yet. Lausong show has a picture, excerpted as follows for further study:

 

The architecture of X5 is mainly centered on "models", and there must be a variety of underlying "Resolution engines" to process these models, such:

I think this huge system diagram has exposed many "efficiency problems ". This is consistent with my concerns after I first read the X5 demonstration last year. In fact, the "access speed" has always been a problem during the demonstration of lausong.