RedHatLinux9 has severely hindered the development of Linux

Many people are currently using RedHatLinux9 for many reasons, including books that use it as a very classic version. However, we must acknowledge that RedHatLinux9 is very old, think about the four-year gap between the 2.6.22 kernel and the 2.4.20 kernel. I told at least three hundred people not to use RH9 and upgrade it to F7 or use Debian, and they all said they don't know there are other Linux except RH9! We can blame them for being too stupid and ignorant. We only know 1. I don't know 2. Now many people are using Red Hat Linux 9. There may be many reasons, including what books use it, it is also a very classic version, but we must admit that Red Hat Linux 9 is very old. Think about the four-year gap between the 2.6.22 kernel and the 2.4.20 kernel. I told at least three hundred people not to use RH9 and upgrade it to F7 or use Debian, and they all said they don't know there are other Linux except RH9! Can we blame them for being too stupid, so they only know 1 and don't know 2?

RH9 is an early version. Although it is a product of its generation with Windows XP, it has developed rapidly since Linux Desktop started late, therefore, RH desktop level is not flattering-I mean most people use Linux for desktop applications, and I didn't mean people who use RH9.

I told those people: If there are no special requirements, please do not use RH9.

I want to say that, in order not to cause more trouble, for beginners, please use Debian linux + GNOME Desktop Manager + GNOME application + KDE application.

Therefore, in order to better support your hardware and enjoy a better Linux experience, please use new kernel versions.