Relationship Between Tang Jun and Tang Seng

Today, I saw Tang Jun's latest interview transcript from Sina news, and talked about his questions about "fake academic qualifications". His answers made me feel quite charming, let's take an excerpt for your appreciation. By the way, what is his conclusion? Is he wrong?

The question is"Re-talk about academic qualifications: I don't know where the error is"

Then return to the opening session. A few days ago, I had one with a media friend and I felt very touched. This media friend talked to me about the so-called July storm. He said Tang Jun. What is the relationship between the storm in July and you? Besides, what we care about is your ability, and we don't care about your education. I said you can't say that. It seems that I have no education. He said, do you know what the problem is? Where do you know? I said that the problem is either information asymmetry or misunderstanding by many people. He said no. Who is the biggest problem? You have a problem with Tang Jun. As soon as I hear it, I think it is very innovative.

What's wrong with me? What's wrong with me? He said that what you were wrong was that you did not come up immediately to acknowledge your mistake. I told you where I was wrong. I don't know where you told me to admit it? He said that this is what you are wrong. In the eyes of the Chinese, what do you do right? What is important? You do not recognize the error. What are your mistakes? If you identify a mistake, it indicates your attitude. What are your mistakes? This is an attitude issue.

If a person has a bad attitude, will people let you go? I said that my attitude is certainly correct. If I have a mistake, I will identify it. If there is no error, I will not recognize it. He said that this is an American way of thinking. In China, you first recognized the mistake and then talked about whether it was correct or not. I suddenly looked at him. He said that you should think about it again. during the Cultural Revolution, many of our leading cadres were not defeated. I said yes, my dad is. He said that many leading cadres did not make any mistakes during the Cultural Revolution, but they recognized the mistake. I said that my father was also. He said that you have seen that the cadres who identify mistakes have been flushed again after a while, and have been upgraded to a level higher than the original level. I said my dad is more like this, my dad was a department-level cadre and later mentioned the deputy department.

However, after hearing this speech, I really felt deeply and deeply? What do I really want to talk about on this occasion? I am wrong. Although I don't know where the error is, I 'd like to say that you can help me solve the problem as soon as possible. However, if I say this, what is it? It is a matter of attitude.

Thank you again. My attitude is very good. Thank you!