SEO: Win the content of the Baidu weight of the enemy

Reasons for rejection: The article is not readable high continue to work hard

Foreword: NET. As the name suggests, the nets woven by spiders, all-encompassing, Haina rivers. Functional non-fishing nets, is the idea of the net.

Talk about structure (link):

We all know that fishermen fishing nets, nets at least 3 intersection is the basis of the composition, I can assume that: each intersection is an independent site, Baidu Robot is a spider, when only two intersections, when the prey sticky net (when there is content update), spiders can only from one intersection to another intersection point, Three intersection points (you chain him, he chain me, I chain you), four intersections, can form a square, but also with the middle diagonal cross, five and intersection points and so on. The number of intersections determines the size and density of the network, but when the net is large enough, a spider is not run, but who can not guarantee how many spiders, so if in the accurate to the second point, Baidu no matter how powerful, in fact, does not have the full basis of the time before and after the collection to determine whether the original content (release time), A lot of friends will encounter this situation, said my original article first published, but not the first included in the same site, the original article can not fully occupy the rank advantage, that is, the article included in the time to occupy the higher the rank.

Original, pseudo original and complete sneak attack:

Because the cost of creating content is too high, false original became the source of Internet flooding, this trend of growth is entirely by virtue of Baidu did not distinguish original and false original very strong ability. I do not know Baidu's judgment on plagiarism according to how accurate, theoretically said: Based on the time included, the similarity between the two content of how much. Even if it's a manual operation, according to the current trend, I don't think it's completely accurate. Let alone Baidu's robot, I have done a lot of experiments on several sites, included the number and Baidu update time almost, with some very biased keywords (to prevent other stations interference), each site published the same article, title, keyword, Descriptions are the same, but the release time is not the same, published every 12 hours, the results show that the original site ranked at the top of the probability of not more than 65%. The above is the weight experiment of sneak attack and original content, then I also did original and pseudo original contrast experiment, the condition and the previous experiment is similar, the result is not optimistic, search the same keyword, original site ranked in the first chance not more than 30%, and a more important is in the search for the same keyword, False original content is displayed, original 10 pages without results, this not only confirmed that Baidu's ability to analyze Chinese content, but also confirmed that Baidu is too dependent on the title, description and keywords, do not know Baidu weight rules too complex words caused by the consequences or what reasons to be confirmed.

After the words:

There are some high weights and low weight sites, the original content of the test situation does not discuss, I want to say is the machine is always machine, for people, there is observation and observation of the distinction, the rules can also be used, but for the collective good, do not trample the moral bottom line, appeal to everyone to respect the original, spend more time on the user , and spend more money on the utilitarian side of content and media.