Should Linux. FreeBSD and other big and comprehensive systems be streamlined?

Linux. FreeBSD and other large and comprehensive systems should be streamlined-Linux general technology-Linux technology and application information. The following is a detailed description. Since the beginning of a CD, it has been growing to dozens of CD or seven or eight DVDs, and I never know how big the system is.

In fact, what is really useful is something as big as 1CD. The so-called 18000 software included by others is actually rarely used by the vast majority of departments. Every release version is in the maintenance of a large upgrade library. Isn't it tiring? Is it better to put this energy into the production of the platform?

I personally think that the operating system should be a platform, which should be as simple as possible. The user finally installs the corresponding software according to their own needs. It seems that Windows 7 is working in this direction. I don't know if it can be implemented.

In addition, I think of the software bundle that was introduced to Microsoft in Europe several years ago. If the defendant turns to Linux, it would be even more interesting. Almost all the software that can be run is integrated into each release-which is a monopoly.

There are 21 debian 4r3 installation disks. In fact, only the first or the first two can be used to install a usable system.