The summer solstice came, and the year 360 in Beijing passed. As a QA, I often feel puzzled, how to rely on most of the manual test + a few automated tests to ensure the quality of product features. After the development, I have little confidence that I will be able to deliver it to the user through my own testing.
Is the test case design comprehensive? Doesn't feel like covering all the scenes.
Is the test execution correct? Often due to the testing of the hardware software environment caused strange phenomenon, how and code bugs caused by the problem of distinguishing?
Is there a clear division of work boundaries between development and tester communication games? Development to the bug, request to reproduce, is the first refusal, or say, OK?
And so on
The longer the work time, the more problems accumulate.
Summary QA Bird for a year