System Analyst thesis scoring standard

System Analyst thesis scoring standard

The thesis score is 75 points, which can be divided into three grades: excellent, pass and fail.

Scores can be divided:

(1) 60 to 75 points (equivalent to 80 to 100 points in percentage ).

(2) 45 to 59 points pass (equivalent to 60 to 79 points in percentage ).

(3) fail from 0 to 44 (equivalent to 0 to 59 in percentage ).

When scoring, you can use the percentage system for scoring, and then convert it to 75 points for full score (by 7.5 ).

We recommend that you rate the score based on the following five key points:

1. Suitable for the question

Both technical papers, theoretical papers, and practical papers must be discussed in one or more aspects of the answer points. It can be divided into three levels: extremely appropriate, better suited, and basically suited.

2. Application attempt and level (20%)

It can be divided into four levels: strong, strong, General, and poor independent working ability.

3. practicality (20%)

It can be divided into four levels:

There are a lot of practices and in-depth Professional level and experience.

Have good practices and experiences.

There are general practices and basic appropriate experiences.

Have preliminary practices and superficial experiences.

4. expressive power (15%)

It can be divided into three levels, namely, whether the logic is clear, the expression is rigorous, the text is fluent, and the organization is clear.

5. Comprehensive Capability and analysis capability (15%)

It can be divided into three levels: strong, strong, and general.

For the papers in the following situations, points must be deducted (5 ~ 10 points)

(1) The abstract is controlled within the range of 300 to 400 words. Any paper that does not write the abstract is too simple or has no substantive content in the abstract.

(2) The handwriting is relatively scrawled, and many of them are hard-to-recognize papers.

(3) Basically, the text only lists the papers described one by one based on the entry method.

(4) It is indeed a thesis of over-Self-boast, self-advertised, and exaggerated words.

(5) If the content contains obvious errors and vulnerabilities, points are deducted for each type of errors of the same type.

(6) The content is only for projects of the Nature of college students or graduate students, and the actual application background is relatively low.

In one of the following cases, you cannot pass the score:

(1) fictitious plot: the article contains serious false or Untrusted content.

(2) Failure to discuss in detail the practice of project development for verification, mainly from the book knowledge and the paper discussed based on the data excerpt.

(3) the content and methods discussed are too old, or the project level is relatively inefficient. For example, the database design only discusses Foxpro and does not have distinctive features. It is developed with a standalone version (isolated type), a small scale, and no special application projects.