What should I do if Linux wants to become a popular choice?

Article Title: Should Linux become a popular choice for improvement ?. Linux is a technology channel of the IT lab in China. Includes basic categories such as desktop applications, Linux system management, kernel research, embedded systems, and open source.

The debate on Linux is still in progress, and it seems to be going on for a while. Despite the increasing market share of Linux in the desktop operating system, Linux is still outputted by the wide influence of Microsoft's Windows operating system and the average usage of films, those Linux advocates are still trying to bring the penguin into the public's view.

However, the operating system marked by the cute penguin is not ready for routine operation and use by non-expert users. Although my point of view will be ruthlessly rejected and resolutely rejected by some Linux fans, rational people who do not have any emotional preferences still think that in terms of user interface friendliness, this penguin is quite different from Microsoft's Windows system.

Visual effects of "delicious meals"

Whether people like it or not, the visual effects such as special interface effects and translucent operation windows will inevitably become an important factor to attract ordinary users, this seemingly "post on the surface" effect should not be underestimated, or it will play an important role in the war that attracts mass PC users to use the desktop operating system. Taking Apple's OS X system as an example, easy-to-use operations and eye-catching human-machine user interfaces are the catalyst for the rapid growth of the system's market share. However, a considerable number of Linux advocates say that the visual effects of "exquisite food" should be technical, forms, and functions. They still feel unfair to common users for the extremely low usage of Linux in various versions.

Mark Shuttleworth, founder of Ubuntu Linux, recently expressed the same opinion in public. he asked technical staff in the Linux development community to learn from Apple OS X and strive to improve user interface friendliness and aesthetics.

Someone raised an objection that they have tried to develop a Graphic User Interface (Graphic User Interface) to add the visual effect of "exquisite meal. However, there is still no uniform standard in a major version of Linux, and there is no BugFree (referring to Microsoft's R & D process and Bug management philosophy, A Bug management system written independently using PHP + MySQL. Simple and practical, free and open source code) and easy-to-use installation process.

Standardized software packages

In addition, installing application software on Linux is indeed a depressing process. The general time is used for testing, trouble, and hacker manuals, which is very impractical for non-expert users. If this is not especially troublesome, all kinds of software packages of different versions are really prohibitive to ordinary users. Linux of each version seems to have a fixed and unique software package. Therefore, learning a Linux does not mean that you can easily use other versions of Linux. Ubuntu uses Debian software packages, while Suse and Red Hat use RPM. In addition, the installation tools of the software package vary greatly. Linux system developers should completely solve this confusion and establish an optimal standard as soon as possible and firmly take this as a unified standard.

Linux of each release version should strictly abide by this standard, which will enable the software developed based on Linux to be easily installed on each version of the Linux system without any problems. No problem I mentioned is that there is no need for any trouble, no hacker manual, no complicated configuration file editing, no re-build of the kernel, and manual installation and startup of independent software packages. Just like Microsoft's Windows operating system, you can run software installation tools to install application software easily.