Zen and motorcycle Repair art ... (Orthodox scientific method)

......

......

......

"Here are two ways of referring to logic, induction and deduction. Inductive method is from observing motorcycles
Start, and then get the universal conclusion. For example, if a motorcycle encounters a hole in the road, the engine
Then the engine went out again, and then again, the engine was still
Then, on a flat road, there is no stall, and then once again, the engine
It's stalled again. Then this person can reasonably infer that the engine is out of the hole caused by the pit, which is
The so-called inductive method, by the individual experience summarizes the universal principle.
Deduction is the opposite, it is deduced from the general principle of specific results. For example, we know
Road motorcycle has a certain structure, system, repair personnel know that the horn is under the control of the battery, so once
The battery is used up, the horn will not ring naturally, this is the deduction.
To solve a problem that cannot be solved by general thinking, you will have to pass your observations and manuals to provide
Structure, constantly alternating the use of induction and deduction, so as to find a solution. This interwoven mix
The correct procedure, if Orthodox, is the so-called scientific method.
In fact, I have not seen any of the problems with motorcycles that will use all the scientific methods. One
The problem that needs repairing is not so difficult. When I think of these scientific methods, my heart will appear.
An image, it's a giant bulldozer--it's slow to move, its work is dull,
It sounded so loud and clumsy, but no one could do it. It needs
Here there are two ways of referring to logic, inductive and deductive. Inductive method is from observing motorcycles
Start, and then get the universal conclusion. For example, if a motorcycle encounters a hole in the road, the engine
Then the engine went out again, and then again, the engine was still
Then, on a flat road, there is no stall, and then once again, the engine
It's stalled again. Then this person can reasonably infer that the engine is out of the hole caused by the pit, which is
The so-called inductive method, by the individual experience summarizes the universal principle.
Deduction is the opposite, it is deduced from the general principle of specific results. For example, we know
Road motorcycle has a certain structure, system, repair personnel know that the horn is under the control of the battery, so once
The battery is used up, the horn will not ring naturally, this is the deduction.
To solve a problem that cannot be solved by general thinking, you will have to pass your observations and manuals to provide
Structure, constantly alternating the use of induction and deduction, so as to find a solution. This interwoven mix
The correct procedure, if Orthodox, is the so-called scientific method.
In fact, I have not seen any of the problems with motorcycles that will use all the scientific methods. One
The problem that needs repairing is not so difficult. When I think of these scientific methods, my heart will appear.
An image, it's a giant bulldozer--it's slow to move, its work is dull,
It sounded so loud and clumsy, but no one could do it. It needs
is likely to be twice times, five times times, or even 12 times times the size of informal repairs, but you know that you will eventually
To success. There's no motorcycle problem to get it stumped, once you have a real problem, try
All the way that twisted brains still no progress you'll know that this one back you really and old
The Lord is more retwist. "All right!" God, that's all I can do. "So you had to sacrifice a positive
The scientific method of the system.
You take out a notebook and write down all the situations so you know what's going on,
How to solve the problem. This is needed in the field of science and electronic technology. Otherwise, the problem
It can be so complicated that you can't touch your head, then forget how to solve it, and finally give up. In the repair of motorcycles
Car, the problem is not so complicated, but once there is confusion, the best way is to
It is written down, often when you write down, the solution of the method emerges.
To write down the problem correctly, at least take into account six aspects:
1. What is the problem?
2. Assume the cause of the problem.
3. Confirm the assumptions of each issue.
4. Predict the results of the experiment.
5. Observe the results of the experiment.
6. The experiment draws the conclusion.
This is not unlike the methods mentioned in many universities and even high school labs, and we are not just
As a homework, our main thing is to ask for accurate thinking, otherwise, it is easy to
Will fail.
The main purpose of the scientific method is to allow you to know exactly what the truth is, without accidentally entering
Wrong. Every maintenance person, scientist, or engineer has been hurt by not thinking accurately.
Brains. This is why most scientific and mechanical research is always very dull and cautious.
Be cautious, if you are sloppy or have a romantic idea of scientific material, you will soon
Blinded by it. Even if you don't give it such a chance, it can still happen. So in the study of science
Time, one must be very cautious and strict with the law of logic. Don't wrestle on the logic,
Otherwise, the entire scientific structure will soon collapse. As long as your inference is a little bit wrong, you will fall into the bottomless
of the Abyss.
In the scientific thinking, the first step is to write down the problem, the main technique is
Only what you really know is written down and the best way to write it is as follows:
Question: Why doesn't your motorcycle start? It sounds like a dull thing to ask, but it is.
Right. It's better than this: what's wrong with the circuit system? Because you don't know the real problem.
Whether it appears in the circuit system, so you should first say what's wrong with the motorcycle and then proceed to the second
A step:
Suppose one: The problem is in the circuit system. Write down all the assumptions you can come up with and use them later.
The experiment tested what was right and what was wrong.
Record carefully at the outset, saving you a lot of time and not being completely lost.
Lu. So the scientific problem seems to be very dull on the surface, in order to avoid possible future
Error.
The third step is experimentation, in the eyes of the romantic people often think that experiments are equal to science, because this is
Eyes to see. They saw a lot of test tubes and strange equipment. The researchers walked around, constantly
There's a new discovery. They could not see that the experiment was originally part of a large system, so they put the experiment and
Show confused. A man operates a scientific demonstration of the $50,000 Frankstein instrument,
If he knew the result beforehand, there would be no science in the whole thing. But the man who repaired the motorcycle
If you honk the horn to check if the battery still has electricity, it's a real scientific experiment because he
is to confirm his hypothesis with practical action. A scientist who studies television, sadly, says, "This reality
Failure, we did not achieve the desired results. "This is actually a reporter's mistake, because a real
Not to achieve the desired result is called failure, only its results can not detect false
The true and false will be called failure.
So the technique used in the experiment just proves the hypothesis, neither can it be used more or
You can use a little less. If the horn rang the repairman thought the whole circuit system was okay, that
His problem is big, because his inference is unreasonable, the horn will ring only to indicate that the battery is not a problem.
In order to design an appropriate experiment, he must carefully infer the direct relationship between things. This can be done by
The structure of the motorcycle looks out. The horn does not make the motorcycle go forward, nor does the battery. Unless you use very
Indirect method. The circuit system directly ignites the spot in the spark plug, if you do not check this part of the electrical
The road system, you never know if it's the problem.
In order to be properly inspected, the repairman pulls the spark plug and puts it in the opposite direction of the engine.
Position, so the bottom of the spark plug is covered with electricity, and then the repairman touches the lever of the internal combustion engine,
A blue fire will burst in the Heng Gou of the spark plugs. He will make the following two-point conclusion: (a) the circuit has
Problem. (B) His experiment was poor. If he is experienced, he will try a few more times. Check the contacts, please.
Try to make the spark plug ignite, if not ignite, he would think that the circuit system problems, the experiment
That's the end. So he can prove that his hypothesis is correct.
The last part is to make a conclusion. The most important thing to do when you make a conclusion is to write down the results of the experiment.
Neither write more nor write less. The experiment did not prove that when he repaired the circuit system, the motorcycle was bound to
Start because there are other parts that may be out of the question. All he knows is that the circuit system has been repaired
OK, the motorbike may start. So his question is: What's wrong with the circuit system?
So he wrote down the hypothesis and then experimented. So ask the right questions, and choose the right experiment,
Then we can get the right conclusion. This method is used by the repairman in the entire structure of the motorcycle when
Shuttling back and forth until he found out the real reason, once the problem of the machine had been solved, the motorcycle could
enough to keep driving. An untrained bystander sees only the labour of the repairman,
The main work for him lay in the labour force. In fact, this is his most relaxed and minimal job
His most important job is to observe carefully and think accurately, which is why technicians often
Seem reticent, and even cringe when doing experiments. They don't like to talk about it when they do experiments.
, then you can't concentrate on the problem. They infer the structure of the problem by experiment and then
The normal operating structure of the mind is compared, so they see the basic form.
"

......

......

Zen and motorcycle Repair art ... (Orthodox scientific method)