This is a creation in Article, where the information may have evolved or changed.
This article goes from Chen Yuwen's blog: http://my.oschina.net/yuwenc/blog/300592
Example1
Func f () (result int) { defer func () { result++ } () return 0}
example2
Func f () (r int) { T: = 5 defer func () { t = t + 5 } () return T}
Example3
Func f () (r int) { defer func (r int) { R = R + 5 } (r) return 1}
Don't run the code first, run the results in your mind again. and then to verify. If three are all right and not blindfolded .... Well, don't look down, you already know the defer.
A few more lines make sure you run through the code first in your heart, then verify, and there's doubt ...
Well, if you're 0 in example1, you're wrong.
If you think it's 10 in example2, you're wrong ... The right not to count ...
If you feel 6 in Example3, you are wrong again ... If you are right, there is a mistake, OK ... You are the one who is blindfolded!
Do not understand the continue to look down ah ...
The first thing to be clear is thatdefer is executed before return
This is the official document of the Http://golang.org/ref/spec#Defer_statements clearly stated, know on the line, can ignore
And then to understand the way that defer was implemented, I've written about http://bbs.mygolang.com/thread-271-1-1.html before .
The idea is to insert an instruction in the place where the defer appears.
Call Runtime.deferproc
Then, before the function returns, insert the instruction
Call Runtime.deferreturn
And then the explicit go return value is not the same as C, in order to support multi-value return, GO is the stack return value, and C is the register.
The most important point is: return xxx This sentence is not an atomic directive!
The entire return process, no defer before, is to write a value in the stack, this value will be treated as the return value. The RET instruction is then called back. return XXX statement After the assembly is to give the value of the returned value, and then make an empty return: (Assignment instruction + RET command)
The execution of the defer is inserted before the return instruction.
With defer, it becomes (Assignment instruction + call defer instruction + RET instruction)
In the call defer function, it is possible to rewrite the final return value ... It may not have been rewritten. In short, if it is rewritten, it looks like defer is executed after return xxx ~
This is the root of all the defer stories that you think you don't understand.
The basics are there, and then you can say the magic defer. Tell us a simple conversion rule that everyone will never be confused for defer.
The rewrite rule is to separate the return statement into two sentences, and return XXX will be rewritten as:
return value = XXX
Call the Defer function
An empty return
Look at example1 first. It can be rewritten like this:
Func f () (result int) {
result = 0//return statement is not an atomic call, return XXX is actually an assignment +ret instruction
Func () {//defer is inserted before return, which is the assignment of the return value and the RET instruction
result++
}()
Return
}
So this return is 1.
Look at example2 again. It can be rewritten like this:
Func f () (r int) {
T: = 5
R = t//assignment instruction
Func () {//defer is inserted between the assignment and the return execution, and the return value R in this example has not been modified
t = t + 5
}
return//NULL return instruction
}
So the result of this is 5.
finally see Example3. It is rewritten and then becomes:
Func f () (r int) {
R = 1//Assign value to return value
Func (r int) {//R here is a value passed in R, does not change the R value to be returned
R = R + 5
} (R)
return//Empty return
}
So this example turns out to be 1.
Do you understand me?
Conclusion: Defer is actually called before the return. But the form of expression may not be like. The essential reason is that the return XXX statement is not an atomic instruction, defer is inserted before the assignment and RET, so there may be a chance to change the final return value.
When you feel confused, you can use the set of rules I gave to turn the code.