Reprinted please indicate the source: http://blog.csdn.net/zeeslo
At night, I am idle and hanging out on the Internet. I saw someone talking about the problem after 80.
Since I was in the post 80 s, I also had my own ideas.
No matter what the post 80 is, I think I should give the post 80 a chance to speak.
I don't agree with some of my predecessors who have taken some time to judge post 80.
I agree with some more specific facts. 1. I think some shortcomings of the post 80 s are related to society.
Everyone must survive in this society. If you think about the post 80 s, you will grow up in a certain social environment. But have those predecessors developed some popular qualities in some social environments? Are these two social environments exactly the same?
In the post 80 s, do we only find the cause from ourselves? Shouldn't I look for other reasons?
How is education now? One day, I took a taxi and the driver said: the higher the degree of education, the worse the quality. I don't remember where I came from. I don't want to comment on the credibility and authenticity of this sentence, which is quite interesting. At least, I think we should have reflected some social reality.
Do the first batch of people in the 80 s have no such shortcomings as the post 80 s?
Some people before the 80 s classify the people after the 80 s as one type of people. Are you sure you want to consider the characteristics while considering the characteristics of the people after the 80 s? Do you also consider the underlying causes of this social phenomenon?
If we complain about the post 80 s, is there a premise?
Feed the same food to a group of ducks, but it may be very long. But this is the cause of food.
Just like when we mention the Mongols, we think of things, and the women who mention Suzhou are soft whispers.
Through one or two things, or even thousands of things, can we assert that the majority of the post 80 s are like this? I have never seen such a social survey. Only some people wrote posts and wrote articles to describe such a reality. I didn't see anyone analyzing this deep-seated cause (maybe I am not looking at anything about sociology at ordinary times ). If I were a sociologist, I could write more deeply. The relationship between society and the post-80s is left to those who should think about it.
Today, when I saw this on the blog of some technical people, I suddenly remembered that I was in the post 80 s.
In most cases, the post-80s are in the honeypot (this is a family factor and a family factor is an aspect of social factors), so there are some common shortcomings. However, the evaluation should have enough basic support, rather than just taking off the port is what happened after the 80 s.
We have no initiative in some cases. 2. The premise of judgment.
Most of them see the following statements in some articles written by people:
People in the post 80 s lack responsibility, blind self-confidence, hard-working spirit, positioning, and courage to face difficulties.
I have never seen how some people after the 80 s are doing or under what circumstances.
It seems that people after the 80 s have a virtue. I don't think anyone can say that.
Therefore, when judging the commonalities of people after the 80 s, I suggest you clarify the premise clearly. Instead of killing all the people after the 80 s.
Among them, there are many people who are excellent, confident, and self-confident. They clearly position themselves and are very energetic and resilient.
Of course, it is estimated that most of the post-80s are in common, so this problem will return to the description in the first section. If you have not investigated and analyzed the social hierarchy, historical causes, and social factors, this commonality should not be said from an irresponsible person. No one will recognize the unfounded accusations!
If the person who wrote the article has investigated and analyzed it, OK. Let's take a look at your results. Who is the cause?
At least I don't think this generation is my own fault (I don't rule out some of my own factors ). Divide the premise and scope clearly and then judge. I think it is more reliable. 3. The positioning is unclear.
I think I should ask the people after 80. Don't we?
Is it because of two thousand people in the Post-80 s that more people in the Post-80 s can be circled in this prison?
I admit that some people in the post 80 s are not doing well enough.
This requires not only the efforts of the Post-80s generation, but also the contributions of the predecessors.
Among my contacts, there are almost the same number of people in my post-80s and pre-80s who are 10 years older than me (only in the circle of friends.
I think the development of some personalities has a lot to do with time. Do older people know exactly what they should do when they are young?
In my original blog post, I used to reference examples of old scientists (not to mention them more here). When they were young, they did not know what they were doing. Only time has given them rational thinking and social opportunities.
Who knows exactly what they will look like in the future? This is not personally identifiable.
My head told me: Sometimes the goal also needs to be changed. (That's after I say my stubborn thoughts ).
I think it makes sense, although this sentence is very simple. However, it is true that some factors are constantly changing.
Who can plan their future life when they are young?
In the "Wulin rumor", Guo juxia once defined a proposition. To prove that the feeling between talent and Guo is just a temporary impulse.
But if there is no double relationship, it makes sense that this proposition is wrong from the very beginning.
Although the story is not enough to provide strong evidence, can we deny the correctness of this statement?
Some propositions are wrong from the very beginning, so do not analyze them any more.
Of course, I am not denying the rationality and necessity of the plan.
Sometimes, I am also setting my own goals. I just want to explain that some positioning is not something that a young man can think clearly.
In my first blog post, I criticized ignorance without positioning. I admit that there should be positioning. It is not that easy for many people to locate the problem. Therefore, some criticism is unacceptable for the post 80 s. Because we have been working hard. 4. Questions about self-confidence.
I have always felt that self-confidence is a necessary factor for growth. At least it is a necessary factor for better growth.
Nor can we exclude the existence of people after 80 who are crazy, self-confident, and self-confident, and have nothing to understand.
So we can divide most people after the 80 s into the shadows of this comment?
I think that I have never been a developer. Maybe I have something to do with it.
However, I am also thinking about what I can do and what I can't do. What I should do and what I should not do.
I think many people in the post 80 s are thinking about this problem.
Taking a simple phenomenon as an example: many companies are very demanding in recruiting and writing, proficient in this, familiar with it, and in actual work?
Is it necessary to be proficient and familiar? It is not necessarily necessary (some real work needs are not ruled out here ).
Isn't it a social problem? To some extent, the society is still impetuous. Why should it be the post-80 generation?
Blind self-confidence is not desirable, but please make it clear. Why is this high level of self-ability only caused by blind self-confidence?
Some people say they should look at their capabilities and determine their salaries.
In this case, I wrote a lot of descriptions in my first blog.
I admit the correctness of this statement.
I also totally deny the unreasonable statement that some post-80 people think that the same salary should be used if they are in the same situation.
When you need to be confident, you must be confident and show your abilities. Is it impossible?
Some should also work hard when learning, and do not make ignorant confidence a joke. We hope that our generation after the 80 s will not be impetuous and calmly face ourselves and this social environment.
Companies and their predecessors face our generation after the 80 s. We will also think about it.
