At present, my mode of thinking

First I don't know the concept, I don't look down.

The good habit of forming is. Often reflect on what is the definition of a problem. What's the premise?

Breaking point: Principle A, trying to give a question that is not even described is a stupid answer!! But the truth is, it happens 233 times.

The second is really vague, I'm enumerating test instructions.

The third is to consider the premise of one thing recursively. Is the premise of the premise premise of the model, I think there are other advanced models such as construction? Of course, I don't even know the definition. There might be.

Third, consider the ambiguity of one thing, if there is ambiguity we separate, then there is a dynamic situation

Consider the integrity of the system. That's the story of the above dynamic. There is no ambiguity about the previous method of judging. You changed the part of the system.

Then you should refer to the logic of the other parts of this section that are written on the paper, to ensure that the judgment of the whole system remains unambiguous after the change.

The four should learn to draw and write formulas. The biggest lift is. Understand recursive functions to draw a direct

Recursive Tree chart: This will solve the problem of memory problems in the brain.

The other is to learn to draw. Just like understanding pointers. It's an address where the address exists where the problem is, draw a reference graph

Sixth, the final step of the work to converge. When you don't know what to do when you go to the current step. Don't be confused, can work down, do the end! Sometimes it is the next step, sometimes the next 20 steps ~50

If it's convergent, we'll do it. Many times we can broaden and progress our thinking, of course, we can use induction and similar to the greedy method of proof to engage in. But I'm not very good at both. 233

Seventh all correctness principle. How to judge a thing is right. Is it right to have a sample? You've seen a couple of data, all right?

You got your WA data over, right? That's all right, right? The right one, as you want, is the function all right?

Sorry, none of this proves correct. Only.. All the work that is constrained in your real-time working system under the constraints of your thinking on all types of data is right short

And the statements of all the programs you write are executed as you expect. Note is all program statements: As long as there is one wrong. Oh

Then we have to understand the test instructions in your right. Input data range, output data range, input and output format constraints, input data mathematical constraints in the case can be AC a topic

We often ignore the output data range, resulting in burst int, we often ignore the input and output format requirements, resulting in WA or PE,

We often overlook the function of functions: Function names are sometimes not as functional as we think. Please do not fantasize. Read the instruction manual very first.

When you have questions about function functions and constraints on input and output. It's going to be okay. This idea might make you wa the whole game.

The only concern for the answer is influence. So there are a lot of subjects for research. When there is a lot of detail, your mind is too divergent to concentrate. After thinking about some of the details.

Forget about it. And to think about the other. resulting in an illusion of no solution or difficulty.

For this scenario: We need to narrow down the scope of the study. Care only about the key factors that have an impact on our answers.

Sometimes it's hard to narrow down the range. Then we need to analyze the logical relationship between these quantities. Draw some conclusions

So that we can get some inferences. So that we can get new inferences ...

Ninth, weaken the condition. See if the problem is a composite function: The most obvious: is to ask for the maximum minimum value. So it's obvious.

We're going to do a dimensionality reduction operation. First, the innermost. The minimum value is calculated by the definition of the minimum value. Then we'll ask for the maximum value.

If the problem is analyzed, the conditions of the solution are limited. Then our common idea is to weaken the conditional solution. First, regardless of the condition.

And then add some of the conditions: I think the terms should be in order.

Tenth, the accumulation and collection of the nature of common problems inferences. Exception.. Counter Example: Generalized.. Classic puzzles and common handling methods and thinking

11th, use the known amount. An unknown amount of method to consider the problem.

12th, treat yourself as SB. After thinking: If the person in the lecture asks if they don't understand. If you think, you still don't understand. Raise your hand and be SB

13th, do not use the results of your unfamiliar theories to quarrel with people. Because this theory is a fantastic achievement. There may also be a problem scope that is not appropriate

14th, the principle of seeking truth from facts. When you're holding a result that you think you're good at, show it to others. The results of the analysis of the time there is you also confused place. If you think about it for a few 10 seconds, you're not going to make it.

15th, do not think that the more you say the concept of the other person can not understand you are the more awesome. In that case. You're just a crazy, logical idiot.

The academic aspect is the performance of the loss of standard. You should stand in the overall consideration of the communication system at that time (the position of both parties, the concept agreement, the logical premise, the problem description convention, the talk Purpose agreement).

Similar to protocols in a computer network: If this place is biased. Then there will be the words we often say to swine.

What nouns the other person can accept (signal

16th, the structure of their own knowledge system. What would you do? What are you capable of? All listed and perfect thinking structure better

For example, the various models of network flow (no, the feeling may be after the problem is the network flow is to take out a set of. Take the knowledge you already have.

At present, my mode of thinking