Comparative Analysis of vmware and virtualbox

Comparison and Analysis of vmware and virtualbox testing process: Dual-system xp and ubuntu are installed on the local machine; two virtual machines are installed on each system; each virtual machine virtualizes a Windows 2003 operating system and allocates MB of memory; the disks of virtual box virtual machines are all expandable; the disks of vmwarevirtual machines are all single files. Hardware environment: Core 2 8400 + 2G DDR2 800 memory + Western Digital 7200 to 1 TB sata hard drive + Ati HD3450 graphics operating system: windows xp, ubuntu 9.04 www.2cto.com virtual machine: virtual box 2.1.4, vmware workstation 6.5
The above is the disk Performance Test of the Virtual box Virtual win2003 System In Ubuntu.
The above is the disk Performance Test of the Virtual box Virtual win2003 System in Windows XP system.
The above is the disk Performance Test of the vmware workstation Virtual win2003 System In Ubuntu.
The above is a reference section of the wmware workstation Virtual win2003 System Disk Performance Test in Windows xp: Summary: For virtualbox virtual machines, it uses a large amount of CPU resources to achieve better disk access performance; vmware consumes less cpu resources. Linux is more suitable for setting up virtual machines than Windows systems, and virtualization performance is even better. From the above test data, we can see that the access time of the virtual box virtual machine is significantly faster than the access time of vmware, but the sudden transmission rate is not as good as that of vmware, And the cpu time is nearly 10 times higher than that of vmware, the average data transmission between the two virtual machines is equivalent; the other is worth noting that, whether vmware or virtualbox, their performance in linux systems is superior to their performance in windows systems. This article is from the fat shark network.