Final 140 Words Review II

1. Running app:

from the performance, focus on the modification of other groups to find the bug, performance has been greatly improved, enhance the practicality.

functionally speaking, the app can increase the interactivity between users, There are more customer groups, suitable for the crowd is not limited to adolescents and adults.

from UI , optimized the final interface,the UI interface is concise and refreshing.

From the display, the use of the camera, although the quality is not clear enough to affect the interpretation of the effect, but this innovative way to explain is worth encouraging.

2. Gift Selection:

In terms of performance, more stable, but the service finally recommended page return button There is a bug, unable to find the page,

functionally speaking, added "Guess you like" function, with fun. If you can add a product link to a recommended gift, it will be perfect.

from UI , the color of the interface is too simple, lack of design sense, layout needs to be improved.

From the display, the speaker focuses on the explanation, but ignores the function of the product display.

3. Online Exam system:

From the performance, the login interface can not be hit by hitting enter to login, if you use the return system will be Kaka, can not log in.

Functionally speaking, the system Administrator and Examination Administrator Division of labor is clear, the problem is easy to solve, make the whole system easy to maintain.

from UI , the functional division of the interface area is relatively clear and reasonable layout.

From the display, the use of PPT to explain the system is strong, but weak pertinence.

4. Tetris :

Performance, the operation is very smooth, there will not be the phenomenon of the Dayton.

Functionally speaking, the basic functions are implemented on the basis of the addition of such as anti-cheating function, through the operation of the keyboard and other new functions. If you can set up the right rewards to attract users to continue to participate in the game is more perfect.

from UI , for the game interface of the various details of the beautification, very beautiful.

From the show, it would be better if two people were to explain and display the product separately.

5. Look at:

From the function, the increase of shuffling, props, flashing and other functions, creative full. when the elimination of the display is not good enough, if you can bypass the picture. A wide variety of themes to meet the visual experience of different users.

from UI , the overall design generous, the game's background color if you can change according to the user's preferences is better.

On the show, there was nothing wrong in general, but it didn't highlight the point.

6. Food chain Teaching:

Functionally speaking, although the function is very comprehensive, but the practicability is not strong, the attraction is not enough, the application population is less, may apply only to learn about the food chain related knowledge.

from On the UI , the background picture is naïve, but the layout is reasonable, easy to get started.

From the display, two people together to explain, the idea is very good, if you can practice more before class, increase the degree of tacit understanding, I believe the effect will be better.

Final 140 Words Review II