Discussion on the Multi-wife mechanism of Dorf

(Glossary: polyandry is the subject of one or more pieces of marital relations. For example, Yong Jun has three wives, including hanyun, Cui, and Aniston. Among them, Aniston has four husbands, in addition to Yong Jun, Peter, Tuo Hai, and yanzu, then, yanzu has two more wives ...... In this way, everyone can be a member of the many-to-many relationship .)

In the course of the development of human society, polygamous wife and polyandry were two widely-existing one-to-many marriages, they correspond to the parent clan society, the maternal clan society, and relatively low social productivity. Later, with the progress of civilization, the phenomenon of inequality was gradually eliminated. People who are or are about to take the "more" role in a one-to-many relationship will naturally be able to break away from oppression, as a result, society has entered the stage of universal coexistence. In the course of this institutional change, I understand that what triggers the change is the great development of productivity and people's demands for freedom and equality. That is to say, reform has nothing to do with the biological nature of people. In the related changes, sexual energy has not only played any role, but has also been criticized without being labeled as immoral, the reaction is limited.

If we look at the one-to-many spouse relationship in the biological community without any ethical vision, we can easily find a common point between human society and other animal populations. Just as in the case of a human being and a human being, it is not necessarily a mating behavior that simply pursues pleasure, human behaviors in choosing the number of spouse actually reflect the essence of being a common member of the biological world. When a person is stripped out of modern society and removed from the various human rules that he has been obeying, his biological instinct to seek multiple spouses is likely to be awakened. At that time, powered by instinct, he will return to the status of feudal society, or even people in primitive society. In fact, the development of society has not changed the biological nature of human beings. It just uses more and more rules to distinguish people from other animals. From the perspective of the current cognitive level, this is a positive role of society, but in the later stages of human evolution, this may be a shackle.

Of course, a major difference between humans and other animals is the evolution of love, a high-level feeling. This kind of feeling can be seen as a result of the overflow of personal energy in quantity and quality. In terms of quantity, in addition to the supply of sexual activity itself, excessive sexual energy extends the scope of its role to the living space of the partner or spouse to produce action love. In terms of quality, sexual energy is no longer maintained at the level of primitive biology. Its position in the body of the person has increased from dedicated-time sex organs to providing material support for brain cells to love thinking, and generating spiritual love. In this analysis, we can naturally infer whether there will be such a day in the future, and the magnitude of sexual energy will rise again, can the current rational standards of action and spiritual love no longer adapt to the supply of energy, leading to a major leap in human cognition of love? By that time, it may be no longer a matter of morality, but a matter of physical and mental status.

Someone may use his/her personal "consistent" and "Love for only one" as an example to oppose my views on the potential of human sexual energy. For the current society, their examples are of course normal, representing the principles that most people (including myself) follow voluntarily. However, they may ignore the fact that, in a historical stage, the principles that are universally recognized by society and the concepts held by members of society are the outcome of matching the system at this stage. People create a system, and the system shapes people in turn. After the liberated people in various countries establish a National Machine and establish the marriage form of a wife as a system, the dominant tools such as law, education, and propaganda will begin to influence the value orientation and sentiment of the people, strongly and effectively standardizes the sexual energy of society as a whole into the framework desired by the national will, And tries its best to make every social member look at the form of marriage with a single division standard of right and wrong. The effectiveness of the system not only ensures individual equality but also reduces the cost of national governance, but also negatively limits the exploration and attempt of unknown fields, it even masks objective requirements. Therefore, under the constraints of the current phase of Rule intelligence and governance capabilities, there are universal things, it is not necessarily the most reasonable and best thing-the marriage system may be such a thing.

It is impractical for humans to say biological, and the decisive role of the material foundation in marital relations cannot be ignored. According to the current social productivity level, the one-wife system is obviously the most conducive to the sustainable social and economic development of the marriage form. In the world, all countries that have entered the modern civilization, the expenditures of citizens for living necessities such as clothing, food, shelter, and travel accounts for the proportion of total household income (that is, the Engel coefficient ~) Very high. Some developed countries are very low, but this low is only reflected in the fact that a small part of people can buy a large number of luxury goods to drive a large car in a big house. Efforts should be made to maintain a family, and it is still a portrayal of most people's life to raise their children to years. In other words, a one-to-many marital relationship requires a person to bear the burden of multiple families, which cannot be widely used in the current world economy climate. From this perspective, it can be said that the total economic volume determines the marital system. If you have no money, you will not be able to raise many children. In the end, his multi-wife system was built on the basis of the "fa Haida.

For details about the family operation mode in the polymy society, refer to the "Public Funds" concept of some families. The husband and wife at both ends of each link regularly deposit the money specified in the marriage contract into the home account as the living expenses reserve of the same family. In addition to spending when two people live together, the money for raising children is also spent in this reserve account. If a woman has three husbands at the same time, she needs to deposit money into three household accounts. Of course, according to the three marriage contracts when the three families were established respectively, and the actual situation later, the specific amount of the three money should be different. Similarly, a man has three wives at the same time and operates according to similar solutions. By reviewing the assets of both parties applying for registration, the marriage registrar determines whether to approve the establishment of this relationship. A person with a high income level can afford a large number of reserve accounts, so that he can be authorized to play a role in multiple marital relationship chains. Do not worry that someone will not follow the reserve requirements after establishing a relationship, because this method can be solidified by legal means, just as Japanese law stipulates that a husband's company needs to transfer 50% of his monthly salary to his wife's account. As a result, no matter how large and complex the many-to-many relationship is, it will not lead to a situation where one relationship chain is strong and the other relationship chain is unmanaged. To balance fairness, an exemption mechanism can also be introduced if necessary to enable some low-income people to live in an "old", one-wife model.

Well, at the end of the article, I entered the pledge of loyalty Link (this link is essential to avoid the anxiety generated by mm even seeing this article in the future ). The system vision presented in the previous article is a purely theoretical discussion. It is a non-responsible conjecture about the relationship between human emotions after several hundred years and has nothing to do with my own actions in reality. I have no fear, no fear, no financial resources to act as a pioneer, or leave the opportunity to future generations. As Grandpa Deng joked, Communism is a thing after the next generation. If polyandry can become a reality, it will be a world after me. Currently, my dual mm is loyal to one, and will be loyal to one in the foreseeable future. But in the foreseeable future, it's hard to say ...... I don't know whether you know me or not ~

 

 

The many-to-many relationship mentioned above in p.s 1 is based on the husband and wife as the subject of the story. In fact, it can be inferred that the above ideas and ideas are fully applicable to the situation of homosexuality and biscuence.

P.s 2 currently uses a one-to-one relationship to indicate the relationship between a person and a person's spouse in the IT Data Structure Theory and Practice. If you use a data table to record the spouse relationship of a group, you only need to design a table to meet the requirements. When querying data, you can use inner join to obtain the records of mutual couples. However, in the age of Multi-wife, a data table cannot represent complicated spouse relationships. A separate Association table must be added to store the relationship. The couple's records are obtained through nested inner join ring auto-join. If the underlying transformation is not implemented, the vast majority of existing information systems will not be able to smoothly transition to the multi-wife society in Dorf, super-large databases such as the insurance industry and banking industry will face the dilemma of not recording the customer information accurately-should this be the second issue of "millennium bug?