Emit code performance is optimized.

Performance Comparison before optimization:

 

Object get dummy structure comparison

Objectwithvalueandattribute P = new objectwithvalueandattribute ();

100000

 

------ Test started: Assembly: pixysoft. Framework. reflection. dll ------

Reflection
Time elapsed: 4,589 Ms
CPU time: 4,015,625,000 NS
Gen 0: 484
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

Emit direct call Handler
Time elapsed: 1,406 Ms
CPU time: 1,359,375,000 NS
Gen 0: 1067
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

Emit with handler Cache
Time elapsed: 1,589 Ms
CPU time: 1,562,500,000 NS
Gen 0: 1080
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 7.80 seconds (ad hoc ).

 

 

Serialization performance comparison:

Objectwithvalue pojo = createmypojo ();

5000

------ Test started: Assembly: pixysoft. Framework. configurations. dll ------

XML serialize
Time elapsed: 877 Ms
CPU time: 859,375,000 NS
Gen 0: 64
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

Dynamic serialize
Time elapsed: 395 Ms
CPU time: 375,000,000 NS
Gen 0: 238
Gen 1: 1
Gen 2: 0

Direct serialize
Time elapsed: 94 Ms
CPU time: 93,750,000 NS
Gen 0: 139
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 1.47 seconds (ad hoc ).

 

Deserialization Performance Comparison

Objectwithvalue pojo = createmypojo ();

5000

 

------ Test started: Assembly: pixysoft. Framework. configurations. dll ------

XML deserialize
Time elapsed: 916 Ms
CPU time: 890,625,000 NS
Gen 0: 60
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

Dynamic deserialize
Time elapsed: 359 Ms
CPU time: 359,375,000 NS
Gen 0: 179
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 1.44 seconds (ad hoc ).

 

Deserialization Performance Comparison

Objectwithcollecton pojo = createmypojo3 ();

500

 

------ Test started: Assembly: pixysoft. Framework. configurations. dll ------

XML deserialize
Time elapsed: 1,688 Ms
CPU time: 1,671,875,000 NS
Gen 0: 121
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

Dynamic deserialize
Time elapsed: 233 Ms
CPU time: 218,750,000 NS
Gen 0: 42
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 2.14 seconds (ad hoc ).

 

Plug-in Performance Comparison

Iperson P = new person ();

500

 

------ Test started: Assembly: pixysoft. Framework. plugins. dll ------

XML deserialize
Time elapsed: 24,890 Ms
CPU time: 17,937,500,000 NS
Gen 0: 1497
Gen 1: 2
Gen 2: 0

Proxy deserialize
Time elapsed: 9,447 Ms
CPU time: 3,390,625,000 NS
Gen 0: 441
Gen 1: 1
Gen 2: 0

1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 35.08 seconds (ad hoc ).

 

Remoting Performance Comparison

Iremotingvalue value = pixysoft. Tools. pojohelper. getpojo <iremotingvalue> ();

500

------ Test started: Assembly: pixysoft. Framework. remoting. dll ------

Reflect
Time elapsed: 7,236 Ms
CPU time: 2,125,000,000 NS
Gen 0: 155
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

Dynamic
Time elapsed: 7,520 Ms
CPU time: 1,765,625,000 NS
Gen 0: 130
Gen 1: 0
Gen 2: 0

1 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped, took 14.95 seconds (ad hoc ).

 

 

Summary:

This meaningless optimization wasted three hours. The original performance problem is in the log. It takes 1.6 seconds to enable logging.

And optimizedCodeOnly from 0.5 ms-> 0.1 Ms. The resolution is 0.4 milliseconds. Almost no optimization ..

It seems that a powerful profiler tool is needed.