How to record instruction-history and function-call-history in GDB

Source: Internet
Author: User
Tags linux mint




(EDIT: per the first answer below the current "trick" seems to be using an Atom processor.

But I hope some gdb guru can answer if this is a fundamental limitation, or whether there adding support for other processors is on the roadmap?)


Reverse execution seems to be working in my environment: I can reverse-continue, see a plausible record log, and move around within it:


(gdb) start

...Temporary breakpoint 5 at 0x8048460: file bang.cpp, line 13.

Starting program: /home/thomasg/temp/./bang


Temporary breakpoint 5, main () at bang.cpp:13 13 f(1000);

(gdb) record

(gdb) continue Continuing.


Breakpoint 3, f (d=900) at bang.cpp:5 5 if(d) {

(gdb) info record

Active record target: record-full

Record mode:

Lowest recorded instruction number is 1.

Highest recorded instruction number is 1005.

Log contains 1005 instructions.

Max logged instructions is 200000.

(gdb) reverse-continue Continuing.


Breakpoint 3, f (d=901) at bang.cpp:5 5 if(d) {

(gdb) record goto end

Go forward to insn number 1005 #0 f (d=900) at bang.cpp:5 5 if(d) {

However the instruction and function histories aren‘t available:  (gdb) record instruction-history

You can‘t do that when your target is `record-full‘ (gdb) record function-call-history

You can‘t do that when your target is `record-full‘ And the only target type available is full, the other documented type "btrace" fails with "Target does not support branch tracing." So quite possibly it just isn‘t supported for this target, but as it‘s a mainstream modern one

(gdb 7.6.1-ubuntu, on amd64 Linux Mint "Petra" running an "Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570") I‘m hoping that I‘ve overlooked a crucial step or config?


t seems that there is no other solution except a CPU that supports it.


More precisely, your kernel has to support Intel Processor Tracing (Intel PT). This can be checked in Linux with:


grep intel_pt /proc/cpuinfo

See also: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/43539/what-do-the-flags-in-proc-cpuinfo-mean  The commands only works in record btrace mode.


In the GDB source commit beab5d9, it is nat/linux-btrace.c:kernel_supports_pt that checks if we can enter btrace. The following checks are carried out:


check if /sys/bus/event_source/devices/intel_pt/type exists and read the type do a syscall (SYS_perf_event_open, &attr, child, -1, -1, 0); with the read type, and see if it returns >=0. TODO: why not use the C wrapper? The first check fails for me: the file does not exist.


Kernel side


cd into the kernel 4.1 source and:


git grep ‘"intel_pt"‘ we find arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_pt.c which sets up that file. In particular, it does: if (!test_cpu_cap(&boot_cpu_data, X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT)) goto fail;

so intel_pt is a pre-requisite.


How I‘ve found kernel_supports_pt  First grep for:


git grep ‘Target does not support branch tracing.‘ which leads us to btrace.c:btrace_enable. After a quick debug with:


gdb -q -ex start -ex ‘b btrace_enable‘ -ex c --args /home/ciro/git/binutils-gdb/install/bin/gdb --batch -ex start -ex ‘record btrace‘ ./hello_world.out Virtual box does not support it either: Extract execution log from gdb record in a VirtualBox VM


Intel SDE


Intel SDE 7.21 already has this CPU feature, checked with:


./sde64 -- cpuid | grep ‘Intel processor trace‘ But I‘m not sure if the Linux kernel can be run on it:

http://superuser.com/questions/950992/how-to-run-the-linux-kernel-on-intel-software-development-emulator-sde  Other GDB methods


See: gdb - list of all function calls made in an application


At least a partial answer (for the "am I doing it wrong" aspect) - from gdb-7.6.50.20140108/gdb/NEWS * A new record target "record-btrace" has been added.  The new target

 uses hardware support to record the control-flow of a process.  It

 does not support replaying the execution, but it implements the

 below new commands for investigating the recorded execution log.

 This new recording method can be enabled using:


record btrace


 The "record-btrace" target is only available on Intel Atom processors

 and requires a Linux kernel 2.6.32 or later. * Two new commands have been added for record/replay to give information

 about the recorded execution without having to replay the execution.

 The commands are only supported by "record btrace".


record instruction-history      prints the execution history at

                               instruction granularity


record function-call-history    prints the execution history at

                               function granularity

It‘s not often that I envy the owner of an Atom processor ;-)  I‘ll edit the question to refocus upon the question of workarounds or plans for future support.





How to record instruction-history and function-call-history in GDB



Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion; products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 days after receiving your email.

If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to: info-contact@alibabacloud.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.