Preg_match_all performance is low. efficiency is poor. Is there any other way? Solution

Source: Internet
Author: User
Preg_match_all performance is low. efficiency is poor. Is there any other way ??? Originally, the use of preg_replace_callback found low efficiency. changed to preg_match_all & nbsp; + & nbsp; str_replacestr_replac preg_match_all. poor efficiency. Is there any other way ???
Previously, the use of preg_replace_callback was found to be less efficient.
Change to preg_match_all + str_replace
Str_replace takes almost no time. it takes more than 0.5 seconds to execute preg_match_all:
------ Solution --------------------
It must be a long time for regular expression matching. paste the code.

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion; products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 days after receiving your email.

If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to: info-contact@alibabacloud.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.