Profit is not easy

Do not know what the top is thinking, brainstorming, seeking innovation, or a whim to get a "majestic", so that everyone fair bet think of revenue growth one times the idea, but also to each PK, see who finally can laugh proud of the lake. Hehe, the more outrageous is also mandatory requirements within the time out idea. This idea has so much to think, does the employer still have to sit here? Finally, regardless of coping, the results are conceivable. In the lake, neither the newborn calf, nor the legendary Daniel, such as the old fritters. Dictionary, just into the company's small fresh meat are very passionate, may be enthusiastic response. But also because they first involved in the lake, do not know the sinister, the idea is too naïve, think the whole world is what they think. Don't ask me why I know, I've been there before. Daniel's words are also very dismissive of such activities, the real master is absolutely in the key moment to the tide or icing on the cake, such a time with uncertainty, certainly not by others to the idea of their own. As for me, the old fritters, as the old fritters will certainly not to mention those who even can not persuade the idea, also certainly will not have Daniel so constructive ideas, why embarrassed me? Profitable, easy?

　　  OK, Next is my spit groove, purely opinion. If you want to make a profit, you must first have enough users, followed by the user willing to pay the bill. First of all, the 1th, enough users, this is necessary, if the user is too few, even if the user all pay, there is no profit to say. Is the 1th, want to do and it is not easy. Users are not fools, and the reason they are attracted to your product is that you have a place to attract them, or that there is a place to meet their needs. Well, even if the company now has a lot of users under the effect of the existing brand, this 1th is OK. Then is the 2nd, but also the most important point is to allow users to pay voluntarily, after all, the way of profit is limited, either the user pays the bill, or the traffic brings the advertising costs. Needless to say, this is even more difficult. Traffic in the case of existing users can not be stable growth or not to consider, and plainly this user experience is very bad, it is not acceptable to people. Like the advertisement of Iqiyi art, who likes to see the advertisement? Do not want to see the video itself, who make you not a member, then you see the ads, or to pay for members, but no matter how the love of the odd arts are profitable, the ultimate reason for profit is that its program is not the other platform, enough to attract people, if its program is general, or the same program other platform not so long advertising, Believe that it will not play so much, profit is not to talk about. In the final analysis, the nature is not the same, not like the video platform to earn advertisers money, it can only rely on users. At this point you have to ask what the user will pay for. As we all know, free is the most attractive, especially in this era of the Internet, want to find the target users, potential users, prompting them to pay, is not a thing to say can be said. Like Baidu hit money to do, such as Baidu outside to sell, I look not enough, I do not see its profit model is what, crazy subsidy business, is to attract a lot of users, we use less than usual money can call a takeaway, but also delivered to the door. But with the toe of the head want to know, Baidu takeout is not possible to do so for a long time. Users start by crazy money to earn, but once not to the merchant subsidy, the price of the outside to go up, there will be how many people in the above order? Users are not buying, not to mention every day to eat takeout people will be bored. The final goal is not profitable, and it will surely die badly. Anyway, I'm not optimistic about this model. Say back to let the user pay the question, also is not the user does not refuse to spend love to occupy petty. If really useful, can really meet the demand, the user may not mind the price you put forward, the iphone is so expensive, or a lot of people buy. The same truth, in the user can not be sure that I am not satisfied with the purchase, the user must still be able to use free of charge is good, in case the money is not worth it is not a big loss? I believe that many users have the idea that we are smart people who refuse to let themselves suffer. So it takes a reason to convince them to pay for them.People, a kind of they just have some kind of demand, and exactly the product provides, this time the success rate of the pay is very high, as for the purchase after the experience is not good enough to achieve the goal of it will not buy a second impact again income is another topic, related to the issue of sustainable income gains; One is that the product has enough to attract them After playing can let them love, in addition to have appropriate to do revenue entry point, not too abrupt, users will be willing to pay the bill. But no matter what kind, is not I can think out, or that sentence, if can think of such idea, labor and management still want to sit here?

Okay, here's The spit.

Profit is not easy