Spam: Does wayos often restart? The problem of multi-Wan Traffic not running is still! It's too spam.

I wonder if you have encountered such a situation:

Wayos has been restarted, sometimes several hours, and several times in an hour! Especially in earlier versions

Like 585, when traffic is high, restart? Many people think so! In fact, it is because the Intranet has many abnormal data packets, such as attack packets and data packets generated by unknown electrical signals, which may cause the wayos to restart.

Multi-Wan: To be honest, only 585 was actually solved. In other versions, although it is better to defend against attacks, there is no traffic for more than 10 Wan, leading to data packet flooding, but there is no traffic, so it will be very difficult, this is a fatal problem!

This problem has been corrected in the wayos 2.03.302 revised version (you can contact QQ: 561454825 if you need a three-day revised version or a genuine version). After testing for 48 Wan and 1700 users, this version is very stable. We often see a lot of attack packets, but it has not been restarted. However, there will still be no traffic problems, but the problem is random and too junk.

A week ago, a customer's route was restarted at and every day. In the past, it was suspected that it was an attack packet. Because 585 was old, the customer could not see the log, because he has many lines and cannot be upgraded to other versions, this time he upgraded 2.03.302. You can check his attack packets:

1. Parts

2. Attacks

......

......

Conclusion: Compared with 302, 585 mainly solves two major problems: frequent restart of routes and occasional failure of Multi-Wan Traffic.

Suggestion: in the current situation, do not switch to version 302 first to avoid the problem of no traffic for multiple Wan instances.

Some customers encountered some problems during ie9: the speed limit suddenly did not limit the speed, the account suddenly increased characters, data export exceptions, and other issues, because I did not have any problems in IE6 and IE8 tests, so I did not find it, but I personally think this is not a big bug and will not affect the use of it. Because ie9 is too large, there must be all compatibility issues with some XMLHTTP, this is not surprising, but in general, this version is quite good.