Yonghao Hu's Law

Recently, when I saw the spicy strips, I thought of the rumors that hot strips were made with body oil. In the past, in order to offset the boredom of learning, I eat a hot strip of boredom every day. But after hearing that rumor, looking at the hot strip of the red oil and spicy paper on the classic week boss of the strange big Head, I immediately produced a deep fear, no longer eat spicy strips. When I was a child to eat so many spicy strips cause I now so ugly, fortunately this is not a bad thing, did not make me uglier. Xd

However, according to yonghao Hu Law, A wide range of things that are shocking to you are often false. Why is it a law, not a theorem? Because the law is proved to be true but it cannot be proved and the theorem has been proved correct. The law is yonghao Hu (Christopher) proposed, the main content as above. To give some specific examples, Coke will kill sperm, nails last month the tooth is a health "barometer",,  girl was drugged after cutting the liver, the boy was drugged after writing the testicles, pregnant women from the operating table down found cut kidney. And so on according to this law, search found body oil as perfume, food is also fake. There are more instances of the verification, can be in a circle of friends or space to catch a lot, what who's QQ leaked (Nick Code, I unexpectedly read someone wrote Grandpa's QQ in the founding ceremony with Zhou Enlai when talking to the leak!!) And who else's famous (please do not casually believe that others quoted, bold hypothesis, careful verification ———— my friend Hu Shi said) above the pseudo-TCM, pseudoscience, not to mention.

According to yonghao Hu's Law , Can derive another law, yonghao hu Second Law , The main content is often shocking is a more in-depth content of a subject, and often know that a small number of people learning that subject.  
example:

• All the data in the computer is 101010, Whether it's the music you listen to, the movies you watch or the games you play;
• 90% of the floating-point numbers (roughly decimals) in a computer are not accurate, not even calculators;
• The computer can never have a program to determine whether a program will end up running within a limited time.

In other disciplines, I think that yes:

• In biology, humans are actually containers of genes. Genes from birth, in order to be able to continue to continue to find DNA as a carrier, and then constantly upgraded to use biological containers.
• In mathematics, no matter how complete a system, there are always some theorems that are true but can never be proved. (The incompleteness theorem)
• In mathematics, the number of natural numbers is as many as odd.
• In astronomy, the moon is the only one facing the Earth and the back can never be seen.
• In astronomy, humans are made up of interstellar matter.
• In astronomy, the stars that you see dozens of light-years away are just the light of their decades ago, but their past. It's now you'll never know. When you look at what other distant planets are doing with your telescope, all you see is what he did in the past. * In economics, the one that collects taxes on buyers and sellers, has the same effect on buyers, except psychologically.
• In economics, the inferior currency replaces the good currency, when two kind of equivalent money flows into the market, if a money value becomes higher, people will tend to collect it, as time grows, eventually a will disappear in the market, B instead.
• In the philosophy of science, falsification. The theory of science must be able to be proved wrong. To give a simple example is that your next door Aunt Wang said that there is a horse in the sky in charge of all, rain is it in the spray times, Thunder is it in the fart, Wang can be all things are attributed to the grass nimah body, but you will never prove that she is wrong, this is not falsified. Newton's Law, 3x+1 problem, Yonghao Hu's law, etc. as long as you find a counter-example, you can prove that they are wrong. This is a falsification.

Call, write so much first. Q.E.D.

Why use Yonghao Hu to name such a great law? Because I'm in the next big game. In case this law was introduced by the foreign Nature magazine, SCI and so on, when someone invited me to make a speech, the invitation letter was the name. And the exit is often only recognized in your Passport English name, yes, the default is your pinyin. If not, the proof will be in trouble. So, Yonghao Hu is not in a lot of it? Xd

Yonghao Hu's Law