Domestic PHP original Forum

Comparison of ofStar CTB wdb discuz fastboard in the domestic PHP original Forum ----- my summary
Because the travel fastboard is encrypted, it won't be compared-Of course it's a good one Program
The comparison below is from a technical point of view and does not consider personal expertise. After all, personal expertise varies from person to person!

Comparison: speed, stability, security, load capacity, background, front-end functions
Comparison between ofStar and CTB
1. ofStar is much faster than CTB in terms of speed
2. In terms of stability, CTB still adopts the traditional concept of stability, which is unstable in a sense!
3. In terms of security, CTB does not filter malicious code.CodeAnd other security issues!
4. In terms of load capacity, when a large amount of data exists, the CTB has a high load caused by management, search, thread, and post browsing! OfStar adopts unique read/writeAlgorithmFor the first time, I broke through the text database load problem!
5. CTB and ofStar have their own advantages in the background, but the backup of CTB is troublesome.
6. The front-end function CTB is not as good as ofStar!
7. CTB started early, with many CTB plug-ins and many ready-made styles!

Comparison between ofStar and wdb
All existing wdb (original version or hack version) have extremely serious security vulnerabilities, so you can easily get the administrator password! Therefore, we do not make a detailed comparison. The simplicity is as follows: stability, security, load capacity, backend, and template settings are not as good as ofStar, and other people's modified versions are far slower than ofStar Versions later.

comparison between ofStar and discuz
ofStar adopts a flat file database and discuz adopts a MySQL database
1. The speed of ofStar is much faster than that of discuz
2, in terms of stability, because different databases are used, for example, the scope of comparison is relatively large, but the text stability algorithm exclusive to ofStar is excellent, and the experiment was successful in large forums!
3. In terms of security, because different databases are used and the comparison is reduced, the Code ofStar is stronger than the discuz free version
4. Due to the different physical structure of the database, in terms of load capacity and backend management, ofStar adopts a unique algorithm, and the two are comparable!
5. In terms of front-end functions, ofStar provides better image and attachment anti-theft functions. The discuz user group functions of the background functions are better than those of ofStar!
6. discuz developed early and has many plug-ins
(Source: Pocky)